Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote: > At Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:53:23 +0300, > Dmitry Rybin wrote: > >> Thank's to JINMEI Tatuya for support. >> I have over 40 views, defined in named.conf, max-memory for cache - >> 32Mb. Named daemon allocate over 2 Gb per 24 hours of work. > > Each view has a separate ca

Re: Testing my configuration

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:36:44PM +0100, Holger Honert wrote a message of 113 lines which said: > check out dig eith the zone-transfer option (man dig): He asked for information about a DOMAIN NAME, which may or may not be also a ZONE. If it is not a zone, zone transfer wont' work. Using:

Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote: >> >>> Have you any ideas how to limit memory usage? >> Unfortunately not, unless you can consolidate the caching views to a >> small number of views. > > If you can allow the multiple views to share a single cache, one > possibility is to create a separate "localhost"

Re: 50 million records under one domain using Bind

>> I believe he is talking on one server not spread out over several >> servers. I think he is trying to see the limit on one server as to how >> many records it could serve reliably. Can the records of a single domain be spread across multiple machines (sharding?) using bind? > I believe that th

Re: 50 million records under one domain using Bind

> If you plan to use a plain zone file for the 50 million records, > rather than using a separate backend database, you may want to What are the backend database options available? Is bind-sdb active developed and is it production ready? > precompile your zone file by named-compilezone. It will

Re: Bind 9.5 configuration doubt

In article , Stacey Jonathan Marshall wrote: > Reinaldo Matukuma wrote: > > Hello. > >> I'm in doubt about defining a SOA record to a zone. > >> Is this correct and valid? > >> > >> $TTL86400 > >> $ORIGIN teste.com. > >> @ 1D IN SOA @ root ( > >>

Re: bind memory usage

At Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:36:31 -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote: > > I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB. > > That cpu can address no more than 16 MB. > i have tried running 9.4.3 instead of 9.5.0-P2 and got odd results. I suspect you shou

Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

At Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:14:06 +0300, Dmitry Rybin wrote: > > If you can allow the multiple views to share a single cache, one > > possibility is to create a separate "localhost" view as the single > > caching view and forward all recursive queries to that view: > > I add this lines in named.conf

Re: 50 million records under one domain using Bind

At Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:01:37 +0530, "Vinay Y S" wrote: > > If you plan to use a plain zone file for the 50 million records, > > rather than using a separate backend database, you may want to > > What are the backend database options available? Is bind-sdb active > developed and is it production

BIND 9.5.1rc2 is now available.

BIND 9.5.1rc2 is now available. BIND 9.5.1rc2 is a maintenance release candidate for BIND 9.5. BIND 9.5.1rc2 can be downloaded from ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.5.1rc2/bind-9.5.1rc2.tar.gz The PGP signature of the distribution is at ftp://ftp.isc.org/i

Re: Stats collection script for BIND 9.5 (and greater?)

At Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:38:49 +0100, Alexander Gall wrote: > Yes, if that assumption is correct, I don't see a big problem sticking > to version 1.0 for the new format in 9.6.0 and 9.5.1. Still, if you > do manage to get this particular change in (I guess it would be > extremely localized and pro