At Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:38:49 +0100, Alexander Gall <g...@switch.ch> wrote:
> Yes, if that assumption is correct, I don't see a big problem sticking > to version 1.0 for the new format in 9.6.0 and 9.5.1. Still, if you > do manage to get this particular change in (I guess it would be > extremely localized and probably doesn't require any actual code > change at all) that would be preferrable, IMHO. After an internal discussion, we've decided to bump the version number to 2.0. It's not included in 9.6.0rc2, but we don't plan to issue another RC for 9.6.0 just for this. The same change will appear in 9.5.1 (not included in 9.5.1rc2). Hopefully this won't happen a different type of compatibility issues. --- JINMEI, Tatuya Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
