JINMEI Tatuya / escreveu:
question is is there something i can do to low bind's memory
usage and successfully run it on those very low embedded devices ???
Admittedly, BIND9 tends to require a lot of memory. I'm not sure if
it can reasonably function with a total system
Peter Dambier escreveu:
I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB.
That cpu can address no more than 16 MB.
$ cat /proc/meminfo
total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 14540800 10596352 398 3194880 1003520 3518464
very
On 13.12.08 23:12, Vinay Y S wrote:
> The record names and values could be any valid labels. All the record
> names I plan to use for tests are of form sub.domain.tld and values
> are IP addresses for A record and other suitable values for other
> record types. Would the nature of record types and
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:26:51PM +,
Chris Thompson wrote
a message of 28 lines which said:
> As the recent thread ("can't see nameserver externally") reminds us
> -- for edu rather than com/net, but there can't really be a
> difference, can there? the nameservers are just a subset --
> g
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:09:57PM +0530,
Vinay Y S wrote
a message of 23 lines which said:
> Also, is there any known deployments of bind of this scale out there?
Half of the ".de" name servers are BIND and ".de" has 12 millions of
domains, which probably means close to 50 millions of record
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:06:05 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:09:57PM +0530,
> Vinay Y S wrote
> a message of 23 lines which said:
>
>> Also, is there any known deployments of bind of this scale out there?
>
> Half of the ".de" name servers are BIND and ".de" ha
> From: Robert
> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:01:16 -0500
>
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:06:05 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:09:57PM +0530,
> > Vinay Y S wrote
> > a message of 23 lines which said:
> >
> >> Also, is there any known deployments of bind of this
Greetings:
Seeing in my named.log entries for "too many timeouts resolving
''..." makes me wonder if my server is an
open recursive server.
Where is the test please for open recursion so I can check?
Assist appreciated.
Regards,
GRegory Hicks
___
bind
Thank's to JINMEI Tatuya for support.
I have over 40 views, defined in named.conf, max-memory for cache -
32Mb. Named daemon allocate over 2 Gb per 24 hours of work.
Have you any ideas how to limit memory usage?
Dmitry Rybin wrote:
> max-cache-size 64M;
> # /usr/bin/limits -v 1200M /usr/local/sbi
9 matches
Mail list logo
