> From: Robert <no...@noplace.nowhere> > Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:01:16 -0500 > > On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:06:05 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:09:57PM +0530, > > Vinay Y S <vi...@vys.in> wrote > > a message of 23 lines which said: > > > >> Also, is there any known deployments of bind of this scale out there? > > > > Half of the ".de" name servers are BIND and ".de" has 12 millions of > > domains, which probably means close to 50 millions of records. > > I believe he is talking on one server not spread out over several > servers. I think he is trying to see the limit on one server as to how > many records it could serve reliably.
I believe that the limiting factor is not going to be the size of the database, but how fast the machine can process network requests. Ie, how many queries per second; If the machine can only handle 10k queries per second, then the MOST it will see is 10k qps even if 11k qps are coming in. Regards, GRegory Hicks --------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory Hicks | Principal Systems Engineer | Direct: 408.569.7928 People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf -- George Orwell The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. -- Thomas Jefferson "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." --Alexander Hamilton _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users