Matus UHLAR - fantomas fantomas.sk> writes:
>
> > > Would it be convenient to try 9.8.1b1? It has a fix that may address
> > > this problem.
>
> On 30.05.11 18:31, Evan Hunt wrote:
> > I should add that I don't recommend using 9.8.1b1 in a production
> > environemnt because of a known security
> > Would it be convenient to try 9.8.1b1? It has a fix that may address
> > this problem.
On 30.05.11 18:31, Evan Hunt wrote:
> I should add that I don't recommend using 9.8.1b1 in a production
> environemnt because of a known security flaw. But it might be
> informative to test with it and see
> Would it be convenient to try 9.8.1b1? It has a fix that may address
> this problem.
I should add that I don't recommend using 9.8.1b1 in a production
environemnt because of a known security flaw. But it might be
informative to test with it and see whether it addresses the
CNAME problem, and i
> after upgrading to 9.8.0p2 I have notices problems with recursive queries.
> The server sometimes does not return answer for e.g. www.yahoo.com.
Would it be convenient to try 9.8.1b1? It has a fix that may address
this problem.
--
Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
_
Hello,
after upgrading to 9.8.0p2 I have notices problems with recursive queries.
The server sometimes does not return answer for e.g. www.yahoo.com.
Repeated lookups for www.yahoo.com sometimes do, sometimes do not return the
answer, only the first CNAME, but the nameserver did know where the C
5 matches
Mail list logo