Re: duplicate records

2013-08-20 Thread Mark Andrews
lication date of that RFC (July 1997). > > - Kevin > > On 8/20/2013 3:14 PM, Nidal Shater wrote: > > we know that BIND eleminate duplicate records, which version of BIND > > that doesn't do that ? > > NIDAL -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St

Re: duplicate records

2013-08-20 Thread Kevin Darcy
Since such behavior would flagrantly violate RFC 2181, Section 5, look for a version prior to the publication date of that RFC (July 1997). - Kevin On 8/20/2013 3:14 PM, Nidal Shater wrote: we know that BIND eleminate duplicate records, which version of BIND that doesn&#

duplicate records

2013-08-20 Thread Nidal Shater
we know that BIND eleminate duplicate records, which version of BIND that doesn't do that ? NIDAL ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-

Re: Duplicate records?

2012-12-21 Thread Chris Buxton
On Dec 21, 2012, at 8:45 AM, Marek Kozlowski wrote: > As I can see BIND allows duplicate A: > > pikusIN A 192.168.1.1 > pikusIN A 192.168.1.2 Those aren't duplicates. They are a record set of two records. If they had the same data, we would call them duplicates. A record set is a set of

Duplicate records?

2012-12-21 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) As I can see BIND allows duplicate A: pikusIN A 192.168.1.1 pikusIN A 192.168.1.2 and PTR: 192.168.1.1.IN PTR pikus.somedomain.com. 192.168.1.1.IN PTR filemon.somedomain.com. and disallows duplicate CNAMEs in the same way. For A and PTR both records are returned. My question