:-) As I can see BIND allows duplicate A: pikus IN A 192.168.1.1 pikus IN A 192.168.1.2
and PTR: 192.168.1.1. IN PTR pikus.somedomain.com. 192.168.1.1. IN PTR filemon.somedomain.com. and disallows duplicate CNAMEs in the same way. For A and PTR both records are returned. My questions are: 1. Is using duplicate A and PTR a standard (RFC...?) supported by all named implementations? 2. Is using this duplicate A / PTR a good practice? 3. If A can be duplicated and CNAME cannot -- what's the reason for using CNAMEs (A-s are better). Thanks for any help, Best regards, Marek _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
