On Jul 3, 2012, at 10:58 AM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
> Jan-Piet wrote on 07/03/2012 10:41:20 AM:
>
>> Building BIND is easy; turning it into an installable RPM not so.
>> I highly recommend fpm [1] which makes building an RPM trivial. :)
>
> Any advice or tricks for making a DEB for Ubuntu?
>
>
> > Building BIND is easy; turning it into an installable RPM not so.
> > I highly recommend fpm [1] which makes building an RPM trivial. :)
>
> Any advice or tricks for making a DEB for Ubuntu?
Yes: use fpm. :)
> So far my plan was to copy the source directory to each server and just
> run "ma
Jan-Piet wrote on 07/03/2012 10:41:20 AM:
> Building BIND is easy; turning it into an installable RPM not so.
> I highly recommend fpm [1] which makes building an RPM trivial. :)
Any advice or tricks for making a DEB for Ubuntu?
So far my plan was to copy the source directory to each server and
> While it's always better to compile and install from the latest
> stable version, it's also nice to use their package management
> system especially when you have to deal with multiple systems.
Building BIND is easy; turning it into an installable RPM not so.
I highly recommend fpm [1] which mak
g] On Behalf Of
Oscar Ricardo Silva
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 10:33 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: bind dies with assertion failure
(Sorry, forgot to include the right Subject line so re-sending)
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:40:51 -0500 > From: Oscar
(Sorry, forgot to include the right Subject line so re-sending)
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:40:51 -0500
> From: Oscar Ricardo Silva
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: bind dies with assertion failure
> Message-ID: <4ff22373.2000...@mail.utexas.edu&
07/03/2012 01:16 AM, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote:
>> I *THINK* I found the reason for why we're exposed to this bug ...
>> It would appear that Redhat based their BIND package on 9.8.2rc1.
>> Guess where the patch for this bug was applied? 9.8.2rc2.
> Are you sure about this?
> From what I can se
Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote on 07/02/2012 06:40:51 PM:
> The reason I'm running is that we're currently running the stock version
> of BIND available with RHEL6. It's their policy to backport patches and
> if there's a patch available then they may apply it faster rather than
> deploying a new
dies with assertion failure
On 07/03/2012 01:16 AM, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote:
> I *THINK* I found the reason for why we're exposed to this bug ... It
> would appear that Redhat based their BIND package on 9.8.2rc1. Guess
> where the patch for this bug was applied? 9.8.2rc2.
Are
On 07/03/2012 01:16 AM, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote:
I *THINK* I found the reason for why we're exposed to this bug ... It
would appear that Redhat based their BIND package on 9.8.2rc1. Guess
where the patch for this bug was applied? 9.8.2rc2.
Are you sure about this?
From what I can see in ou
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 07:16:40PM -0500, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote:
> I *THINK* I found the reason for why we're exposed to this bug ... It
> would appear that Redhat based their BIND package on 9.8.2rc1. Guess
> where the patch for this bug was applied? 9.8.2rc2.
Sigh. It wouldn't be the fi
I *THINK* I found the reason for why we're exposed to this bug ... It
would appear that Redhat based their BIND package on 9.8.2rc1. Guess
where the patch for this bug was applied? 9.8.2rc2.
Oscar
On 07/02/2012 05:47 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
I can't answer for RedHat, but this bug fix was in
I can't answer for RedHat, but this bug fix was included in BIND 9.8.2.
3284. [bug] Address race conditions with the handling of
rbtnode.deadlink. [RT #27738]
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 05:40:51PM -0500, Oscar Ricardo Silva wrote:
> I may have missed something but
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:16:05 -0600
From: Michael Graff
To: Alex
Cc:bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: bind dies with assertion failure
Message-ID:<9a4c0b81-4221-465a-a952-3523bd576...@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
It is a known issue, and is indeed a
It is a known issue, and is indeed a bug. We're working on it already, so stay
tuned.
--Michael
On Feb 14, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a fedora16 x86_64 box and named keeps dying with an assertion failure:
>
> 14-Feb-2012 13:24:41.137 general: critical: rbtdb.c:1619:
> IN
Hi,
I have a fedora16 x86_64 box and named keeps dying with an assertion failure:
14-Feb-2012 13:24:41.137 general: critical: rbtdb.c:1619:
INSIST(!((void *)((node)->deadlink.prev) != (void *)(-1))) failed
14-Feb-2012 13:24:41.137 general: critical: exiting (due to assertion failure)
This is bin
16 matches
Mail list logo
