On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 14:09 -0600, David Forrest wrote:
> To get rid of all those "nice" log entries, I have this in my
> named.conf:
Thanks, David.
For now, they're not so frequent as to be a nuisance.
/Niall
___
bind-users ma
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <1234867921.16690.43.ca...@d410-heron>, "Niall O'Reilly" writes:
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 12:17 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
It should be unrelated. I would however still upgrade.
Thanks, Mark.
If I don't see the same assertio
In message <1234867921.16690.43.ca...@d410-heron>, "Niall O'Reilly" writes:
> On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 12:17 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > It should be unrelated. I would however still upgrade.
>
> Thanks, Mark.
>
> If I don't see the same assertion failure with
> the current re
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 12:17 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> It should be unrelated. I would however still upgrade.
Thanks, Mark.
If I don't see the same assertion failure with
the current release, I guess that's closed.
One advantage of upgrading is getting all thos
T /var/log/messages.1
> Feb 13 14:12:57 marlay named[2226]: adb.c:1526: INSIST(find->adbname == ((void
> *)0)) failed
> joe(user)11:
>
> If this assertion failure is covered by the following entry in the
> CHANGES file, I just need to upgrade.
>
> 2139.
joe(user)8: uname -a
Linux marlay.no8.be 2.6.9-1.667 #1 Tue Nov 2 14:41:31 EST 2004 i586 i586 i386
GNU/Linux
joe(user)9: named -v
BIND 9.4.2-P1
joe(user)10: grep INSIST /var/log/messages.1
Feb 13 14:12:57 marlay named[2226]: adb.c:1526: INSIST(find->adbname == ((void
*)0)) failed
joe(user
6 matches
Mail list logo