On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <1234867921.16690.43.ca...@d410-heron>, "Niall O'Reilly" writes:
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 12:17 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
It should be unrelated. I would however still upgrade.
Thanks, Mark.
If I don't see the same assertion failure with
the current release, I guess that's closed.
One advantage of upgrading is getting all those nice
log entries reporting EDNS faults. 8-)
No. You get log entries reporting TIMEOUTS.
Using EDNS is only one possible reason for the timeout and
it is one we have control over so that is why it is mentioned.
Mark
/Niall
To get rid of all those "nice" log entries, I have this in my named.conf:
channel edns-disabled {
file "/dev/null";
};
category edns-disabled { null; };
--
David Forrest
St. Louis, Missouri
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
