ssuming the non-trusted_nets are any net which is not in trusted_nets)
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Robert Willmann
Commerzbank AG
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:05:33 -0700
From: Doug Barton
Subject: Re: Views on differrent interfaces
To: Tom Schmitt
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
Message-ID:
On 4/22/2010 5:30 AM, Tom Schmitt wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answer.
> But this doesn't work: With match-destination and match-clients I can only
> define the same match-clients statement for both destionation interfaces, not
> differrent one.
>
> The only workaround I see how to rech my goa
drews
> An: "Tom Schmitt"
> CC: bind-us...@isc.org
> Betreff: Re: Views on differrent interfaces
>
> match-destination.
>
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma.
match-destination.
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-us
Hi,
I have a simple configuration question and can't find an answer in
doc/arm/Bv9ARM.ch06.html :
I have a nameserver with two differrent views which is listening on two
differrent networkinterfaces. Till now its configured that all queries coming
from a defined IP-range are getting the answer
5 matches
Mail list logo
