On 4/22/2010 5:30 AM, Tom Schmitt wrote:
> 
> Thank you for your answer.
> But this doesn't work: With match-destination and match-clients I can only 
> define the same match-clients statement for both destionation interfaces, not 
> differrent one.
> 
> The only workaround I see how to rech my goal by only using these commands is 
> to define a third view which has the exactly same data like the first view. 
> Then I could use machting rules like this:
> view 1 { match-destination { interface1 }; };
> view 2 { match-clients ( trusted_nets }; match-destination { interface2 }; };
> view 3 { match-clients { non-trusted_nets }; match-destination { interface2 
> }; };
> 
> I hoped there would be a way to do this whith only two views. Like inserting 
> some logic:  matchif( destination=interface1 OR (destination=interface2 AND 
> client=non-trusted_nets) )

Run separate instances of BIND on the two different interfaces.


-- 

        ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
                        -- Propellerheads

        Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
        a domain name makeover!    http://SupersetSolutions.com/

_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to