On 4/22/2010 5:30 AM, Tom Schmitt wrote: > > Thank you for your answer. > But this doesn't work: With match-destination and match-clients I can only > define the same match-clients statement for both destionation interfaces, not > differrent one. > > The only workaround I see how to rech my goal by only using these commands is > to define a third view which has the exactly same data like the first view. > Then I could use machting rules like this: > view 1 { match-destination { interface1 }; }; > view 2 { match-clients ( trusted_nets }; match-destination { interface2 }; }; > view 3 { match-clients { non-trusted_nets }; match-destination { interface2 > }; }; > > I hoped there would be a way to do this whith only two views. Like inserting > some logic: matchif( destination=interface1 OR (destination=interface2 AND > client=non-trusted_nets) )
Run separate instances of BIND on the two different interfaces. -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users