Am 26.11.20 um 03:01 schrieb Mark Andrews:
The message that generated this thread had the following:
To: upendra.gan...@gmail.com
Cc: bind-users , BIND Users
Note the 2 different addresses for bind-users. Both where delivered to
lists.isc.org in a single SMTP
transaction as you noted (ESMT
Am 25.11.20 um 04:46 schrieb Jim Popovitch via bind-users:
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 22:22 -0500, Paul Kosinski wrote:
My reading of the headers (below) does *not* suggest "Reply All".
Rather, they show that mx.pao1.isc.org sent/forwarded the email once,
and it was received by lists.isc.org once
Am 23.11.20 um 04:58 schrieb Jim Popovitch via bind-users:
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 21:56 -0500, Paul Kosinski via bind-users wrote:
I've been getting two identical copies of recent posts to this list...
Me too, but it's because of people hitting reply-all thinking that they
are replying to th
On 26.11.20 13:01, Mark Andrews wrote:
The message that generated this thread had the following:
To: upendra.gan...@gmail.com
Cc: bind-users , BIND Users
I have mentioned this 3 days ago, this info apparently got missed.
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2020-November/103912.html
N
The message that generated this thread had the following:
To: upendra.gan...@gmail.com
Cc: bind-users , BIND Users
Note the 2 different addresses for bind-users. Both where delivered to
lists.isc.org in a single SMTP
transaction as you noted (ESMTP id 026B967ED73) because the MTA worked out t
Yes indeed: I sent the last email (and this one) to bind-users and CC-ed to
you. That explains why there are two different ESMTP IDs.
The question is, have you, like I have, received two copies of any emails (from
lists.isc.org) where there *identical* ESMTP IDs in their associated sequences
of
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 22:22 -0500, Paul Kosinski wrote:
> My reading of the headers (below) does *not* suggest "Reply All".
>
> Rather, they show that mx.pao1.isc.org sent/forwarded the email once,
> and it was received by lists.isc.org once with ESMTP ID 026B967ED73.
> But then lists.isc.org rese
My reading of the headers (below) does *not* suggest "Reply All".
Rather, they show that mx.pao1.isc.org sent/forwarded the email once,
and it was received by lists.isc.org once with ESMTP ID 026B967ED73.
But then lists.isc.org resent/forwarded it more than once, as it was
received a few seconds l
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 08:13 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 23.11.20 um 04:58 schrieb Jim Popovitch via bind-users:
> > On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 21:56 -0500, Paul Kosinski via bind-users wrote:
> > > I've been getting two identical copies of recent posts to this list...
> >
> > Me too, but it's b
On 22.11.20 21:56, Paul Kosinski via bind-users wrote:
I've been getting two identical copies of recent posts to this list
(such as this item). This only started happening in the past 24 hours
or so. Is anyone else seeing this?
Upon examination of the headers of the two copies, it looks like ISC
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 21:56 -0500, Paul Kosinski via bind-users wrote:
> I've been getting two identical copies of recent posts to this list...
Me too, but it's because of people hitting reply-all thinking that they
are replying to the list and the poster. People really need to verify
who they ar
I've been getting two identical copies of recent posts to this list
(such as this item). This only started happening in the past 24 hours
or so. Is anyone else seeing this?
Upon examination of the headers of the two copies, it looks like ISC's
list-servers are doing the duplication.
(The first p
12 matches
Mail list logo
