Am 25.11.20 um 04:46 schrieb Jim Popovitch via bind-users:
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 22:22 -0500, Paul Kosinski wrote:
My reading of the headers (below) does *not* suggest "Reply All".

Rather, they show that mx.pao1.isc.org sent/forwarded the email once,
and it was received by lists.isc.org once with ESMTP ID 026B967ED73.
But then lists.isc.org resent/forwarded it more than once, as it was
received a few seconds later by lists.isc.org (again!) with two
*different* ESMTP IDs: B380C67F367 and E414B67F36E.

This suggests to me that lists.isc.org is being a bit too diligent in
delivering its email.


I just received 2 copies of your post, with 2 different ESMTP IDs...
because you sent it to 2 different recipients.  That same thing would
happen if you sent it to bind-users@lists.isc.org and
bind-users@lists.isc.org.

are list servers still that bad?
our lmtpd kills even real "reply-all" duplicates

the point is that the message in question was *not* a reply-all. i got one identical too in a thread i never where active and simply deleted it long before that subject appeared
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to