In message <96c8e9660904071112p557840a4kfd85120d7c275...@mail.gmail.com>,
Mallappa Pallakke
writes:
> Hi Mark/Kevin,
>
> I did the changes you suggested and it worked fine.
>
> Thanks a lot for all your help.
>
> Regarding round-robin load sharing instead of random, I have
> plann
Hi Mark/Kevin,
I did the changes you suggested and it worked fine.
Thanks a lot for all your help.
Regarding round-robin load sharing instead of random, I have
planned to have a dynamic update (nsupdate) triggered at realtime when
ever a server goes down or comes up so that there wil
Mallappa Pallakke wrote:
Hi Mark,
I do not see any additional section in the response. Can you please
tell me what exactly you are asking me to change?
You're delegating the zone to the same name you're trying to
round-robin. Named is therefore fetching the name multiple times
internally
Hi Mark,
I do not see any additional section in the response. Can you please
tell me what exactly you are asking me to change?
I selected cyclic instead of random since I want my client requests
to go to servers in exactly round-robin order. Please tell is there
anything wrong with this?
T
In message <96c8e9660904061734t61414549o22a535e681f58...@mail.gmail.com>,
Mallappa Pallakke
writes:
> Hi,
>
> I tried with 9.5.1.P2, but still I am not getting the expected round
> robin results:
>
> Please see below my named.conf and zone file:
>
> named.conf:
> =
> options {
>
Hi,
I tried with 9.5.1.P2, but still I am not getting the expected round
robin results:
Please see below my named.conf and zone file:
named.conf:
=
options {
directory "/var/named";
// Uncommenting this might help if you have to go through a
// firewall and things
* Mallappa Pallakke:
> Can anybody tell me why this limitation and is there any sollution to
> resove this problem?
Does your dig call result in two lookups behind the scenes, perhaps?
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.i
Hi,
I was trying to do load balancing of client request among
configured servers using internal DNS server, I get proper load
balaning (DNS response with top most IP address going with proper
round robin fashio) for odd number of IP addresses. But it does not
give same bevior for even number o
8 matches
Mail list logo
