Hi Mark, I do not see any additional section in the response. Can you please tell me what exactly you are asking me to change?
I selected cyclic instead of random since I want my client requests to go to servers in exactly round-robin order. Please tell is there anything wrong with this? Thanks, Mallappa Pallakke On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Mark Andrews <mark_andr...@isc.org> wrote: > > In message <96c8e9660904061734t61414549o22a535e681f58...@mail.gmail.com>, > Mallappa Pallakke > writes: >> Hi, >> >> I tried with 9.5.1.P2, but still I am not getting the expected round >> robin results: >> >> Please see below my named.conf and zone file: >> >> named.conf: >> ========= >> options { >> directory "/var/named"; >> >> // Uncommenting this might help if you have to go through a >> // firewall and things are not working out. But you probably >> // need to talk to your firewall admin. >> >> //query-source port 53; >> >> rrset-order { >> order cyclic;}; // fixed, random, cyclic >> }; >> >> zone "mycompany.com" { >> type master; >> // notify no; >> file "db.mycompany.com"; >> >> allow-update { any; }; >> // allow-update { 127.0.0.1; }; >> notify yes; >> }; >> >> >> db.mycompany.com: >> =============== >> $ORIGIN . >> $TTL 0 ; >> mycompany.com IN SOA www.mycompany.com. hostmaster.mycompany.com. >> ( >> 199813404 ; serial >> 1 ; refresh (1 second) >> 1 ; retry (1 second) >> 1 ; expire (1 second) >> 1 ; minimum (1 second) >> ) >> NS www.mycompany.com. >> $ORIGIN mycompany.com. >> localhost A 127.0.0.1 >> $TTL 0 ; >> www A 10.10.68.1 >> A 10.10.68.2 >> A 10.10.68.3 >> A 10.10.68.4 > > Change the nameservers name to be something other than > www.mycompany.com. > > www.mycompany.com is being retrieved twice once for the > answer section and once for the additional section. Each > retrieval rotates the RRset once. The latter gets thrown > away when named supresses duplicate RRsets in the answer > so you see 2 rotations and 2 divides equally into 4. > > B.T.W. one should choose "random" rather than "round-robin" if > you want uniform load on failure. > > Mark > >> I always get following answers repeatedly. Not getting 10.10.68.2 and >> 10.10.68.3 as top records in response messages: >> ================================================= >> atcafs-n4s1:/kwlogs/msp# dig www.mycompany.com >> >> ; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> www.mycompany.com >> ;; global options: printcmd >> ;; Got answer: >> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 13961 >> ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 >> >> ;; QUESTION SECTION: >> ;www.mycompany.com. IN A >> >> ;; ANSWER SECTION: >> www.mycompany.com. 0 IN A 10.10.68.4 >> www.mycompany.com. 0 IN A 10.10.68.1 >> www.mycompany.com. 0 IN A 10.10.68.2 >> www.mycompany.com. 0 IN A 10.10.68.3 >> >> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: >> mycompany.com. 0 IN NS www.mycompany.com. >> >> ;; Query time: 1 msec >> ;; SERVER: 10.10.68.1#53(10.10.68.1) >> ;; WHEN: Sun Apr 6 00:21:07 2008 >> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 113 >> >> >> ================================================= >> >> atcafs-n4s1:/kwlogs/msp# dig www.mycompany.com >> >> ; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> www.mycompany.com >> ;; global options: printcmd >> ;; Got answer: >> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65208 >> ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 >> >> ;; QUESTION SECTION: >> ;www.mycompany.com. IN A >> >> ;; ANSWER SECTION: >> www.mycompany.com. 0 IN A 10.10.68.2 >> www.mycompany.com. 0 IN A 10.10.68.3 >> www.mycompany.com. 0 IN A 10.10.68.4 >> www.mycompany.com. 0 IN A 10.10.68.1 >> >> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: >> mycompany.com. 0 IN NS www.mycompany.com. >> >> ;; Query time: 1 msec >> ;; SERVER: 10.10.68.1#53(10.10.68.1) >> ;; WHEN: Sun Apr 6 00:21:09 2008 >> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 113 >> >> =================================================== >> >> >> Please let me know anything is missing. >> >> Regards, >> Mallappa Pallakke >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Kirk <b...@kirkb.net> wrote: >> > Mallappa Pallakke wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I was trying to do load balancing of client request among >> >> configured servers using internal DNS server, I get proper load >> >> balaning (DNS response with top most IP address going with proper >> >> round robin fashio) for odd number of IP addresses. But it does not >> >> give same bevior for even number of IP addresses. >> >> >> >> For example: >> >> >> >> If I have configured x.y.z.1, x.y.z.2, x.y.z.3, I get following >> >> combinations in dig response: >> >> >> >> x.y.z.1 >> >> x.y.z.2 >> >> x.y.z.3 >> >> >> >> x.y.z.2 >> >> x.y.z.3 >> >> x.y.z.1 >> >> >> >> x.y.z.3 >> >> x.y.z.1 >> >> x.y.z.2 >> >> >> >> And this repeats, giving round robin distribution. >> >> >> >> However, if I add one more IP address to the zone list (x.y.z.4), I >> >> get only following combinations: >> >> >> >> x.y.z.1 >> >> x.y.z.2 >> >> x.y.z.3 >> >> x.y.z.4 >> >> >> >> and >> >> >> >> x.y.z.3 >> >> x.y.z.4 >> >> x.y.z.1 >> >> x.y.z.2 >> >> >> >> It gets repeated. I will never get x.y.z.2 and x.y.z.4 as top entries >> >> in this response. >> >> >> >> Can anybody tell me why this limitation and is there any sollution to >> >> resove this problem? >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> >> >> Mallappa >> > >> > >> > Not sure what version of BIND you are using, but here I am using 9.5.1-P2. >> > I just loaded a zone with 10 www records and different IP's and they are >> > handed out round robin just fine. >> > >> > The idea of using DNS for load balancing has been brought up here so many >> > times its hard to count. The answer is always the same. DNS was *never* >> > meant to provide this functionality. Spend the big bucks and get a device >> > meant to do *load balancing*. >> > >> > Search the archive for previous threads on this subject. >> > http://marc.info/?l=bind9-users&w=2&r=1&s=load+balancing&q=b >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> bind-users mailing list >> bind-users@lists.isc.org >> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: mark_andr...@isc.org > _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users