sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > I have since learned that you get different version output from dig,
> > named -v, and a dns query and the version statement only affects
> > specific outputs.
>
> What is the difference between using dig and a DNS query?
Dig reports its own version number in the com
In message <77c3c98b-001a-43c3-a56a-e672d4640...@starionline.com>, Jeff Justice
writes:
> Jeremy, it is exactly as you asked. Apparently the "real" version is display
> ed using certain commands, and the "user-defined" version is displayed in oth
> er places.
>
> I have since learned that you g
> I have since learned that you get different version output from dig,
> named -v, and a dns query and the version statement only affects
> specific outputs.
What is the difference between using dig and a DNS query?
I expect the same result from using dig to query for "version.bind
chaos txt" and
So any other ideas why the version directive won't work? Can anyone confirm
> with 9.9.1-P2?
>
> Jeff
>
>
> On Aug 17, 2012, at 9:02 PM, Michael Hoskins (michoski)
> wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > From: Jeff Justice
> &
Jeremy, it is exactly as you asked. Apparently the "real" version is displayed
using certain commands, and the "user-defined" version is displayed in other
places.
I have since learned that you get different version output from dig, named -v,
and a dns query and the version statement only affe
How are you testing it? Where do you see the wrong version?
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-use
On Aug 17, 2012, at 22.02, Michael Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
> -Original Message-
>
> From: Jeff Justice
> Date: Friday, August 17, 2012 6:10 PM
> To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
> Subject: Re: Version statement...
>
>> Okay, here's what I know
wrote:
> -Original Message-
>
> From: Jeff Justice
> Date: Friday, August 17, 2012 6:10 PM
> To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
> Subject: Re: Version statement...
>
>> Okay, here's what I know:
>>
>> named-checkconf says there are no er
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Justice
Date: Friday, August 17, 2012 6:10 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: Version statement...
>Okay, here's what I know:
>
>named-checkconf says there are no errors.
>There is only one named process runni
Okay, here's what I know:
named-checkconf says there are no errors.
There is only one named process running.
When I apply my edited named.conf, the log shows named stopping and restarting
with no errors.
How can I check to see the path where my named process thinks named.conf is
located?
Jeff
Jeff Justice writes:
Hi Jeff,
> I am trying to mask our DNS servers version output to a custom string,
> but it doesn't seem to be working for me. In a nutshell, I have added
> this to my options block of my named.conf:
>
>version "[DNS Server]";
>
> But when I do a query, it still shows th
In message <342bc321-feb7-4b82-bdff-1848fcc60...@starionline.com>, Jeff Justice
writes:
> Doesn't seem to work with or without the brackets. Does it matter what order
> it appears in the
> options list? Or a limit on number of characters?
>
> Jeff
Make sure you are updating the correct named
rsion { none; };
recursion no;
zone "." {
type hint;
file "/dev/null";
};
};
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Justice
Date: Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:53 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Re: Version sta
Doesn't seem to work with or without the brackets. Does it matter what order
it appears in the options list? Or a limit on number of characters?
Jeff
On Aug 17, 2012, at 12:34 AM, David Miller wrote:
>
> On 8/17/2012 1:13 AM, Jeff Justice wrote:
>> I am trying to mask our DNS servers versio
On 8/17/2012 1:13 AM, Jeff Justice wrote:
> I am trying to mask our DNS servers version output to a custom string, but it
> doesn't seem to be working for me. In a nutshell, I have added this to my
> options block of my named.conf:
>
>version "[DNS Server]";
options {
version "str
15 matches
Mail list logo
