I don't suggest using a "heavy" DB back end such as SQL for 50M records
without thought. Each DNS query might do several SQL lookups depending
on the type of query and number of hostname components. Factor in a
mail server and the number of hits becomes a dozen for one instance.
I.e. a.b.c.def.c
On Dec 29, 2008, at 11:35 PM, David Ford wrote:
I use DLZ w/ postgres. It's been working pretty good for me for a
while
now.
Another "just out of curiosity" question. What sort of performance do
you see with BIND/DLZ/Postgres?
The http://bind-dlz.sourceforge.net/ site has some BIND-DLZ
I don't. I have a working DLZ setup.
Scott Baker wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what real world scenario do you have 50 million
> records under one domain?
>
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinf
Andrew Ferk wrote:
>> What are the backend database options available? Is bind-sdb active
>> developed and is it production ready?
>
> You can use mysql with dlz. I have yet to get it successfully
> working, but that's another issue.
>
> One of the reasons I wanted to use a database was for the
I use DLZ w/ postgres. It's been working pretty good for me for a while
now.
-david
Andrew Ferk wrote:
>> What are the backend database options available? Is bind-sdb active
>> developed and is it production ready?
>>
>
> You can use mysql with dlz. I have yet to get it successfully
> work
> What are the backend database options available? Is bind-sdb active
> developed and is it production ready?
You can use mysql with dlz. I have yet to get it successfully
working, but that's another issue.
One of the reasons I wanted to use a database was for the speed
increase. I would probab
At Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:01:37 +0530,
"Vinay Y S" wrote:
> > If you plan to use a plain zone file for the 50 million records,
> > rather than using a separate backend database, you may want to
>
> What are the backend database options available? Is bind-sdb active
> developed and is it production
> If you plan to use a plain zone file for the 50 million records,
> rather than using a separate backend database, you may want to
What are the backend database options available? Is bind-sdb active
developed and is it production ready?
> precompile your zone file by named-compilezone. It will
>> I believe he is talking on one server not spread out over several
>> servers. I think he is trying to see the limit on one server as to how
>> many records it could serve reliably.
Can the records of a single domain be spread across multiple machines
(sharding?) using bind?
> I believe that th
Out of curiosity, if one zone is to hold 50 million records, what
would they all be for? I can't even imagine blogspot or godaddy being
in that league.
Perhaps with this many records just using a wldcard would be simpler?
Then again maybe this is a new tld, or old one being consolidated?
--
At Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:09:57 +0530,
"Vinay Y S" wrote:
> I am studying the scalability and performance characteristics of
> different DNS servers. Goal is to find the best suitable server to
> host a single domain with 50 million records. I am planning to install
> Fedora 10 x86_64 on a 32GB RAM
> From: Robert
> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:01:16 -0500
>
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:06:05 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:09:57PM +0530,
> > Vinay Y S wrote
> > a message of 23 lines which said:
> >
> >> Also, is there any known deployments of bind of this
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:06:05 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:09:57PM +0530,
> Vinay Y S wrote
> a message of 23 lines which said:
>
>> Also, is there any known deployments of bind of this scale out there?
>
> Half of the ".de" name servers are BIND and ".de" ha
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:09:57PM +0530,
Vinay Y S wrote
a message of 23 lines which said:
> Also, is there any known deployments of bind of this scale out there?
Half of the ".de" name servers are BIND and ".de" has 12 millions of
domains, which probably means close to 50 millions of record
On 13.12.08 23:12, Vinay Y S wrote:
> The record names and values could be any valid labels. All the record
> names I plan to use for tests are of form sub.domain.tld and values
> are IP addresses for A record and other suitable values for other
> record types. Would the nature of record types and
2008/12/13 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
>> > On 13.12.08 17:09, Vinay Y S wrote:
>> >> I am studying the scalability and performance characteristics of
>> >> different DNS servers. Goal is to find the best suitable server to
>> >> host a single domain with 50 million records. I am planning to install
>
> > On 13.12.08 17:09, Vinay Y S wrote:
> >> I am studying the scalability and performance characteristics of
> >> different DNS servers. Goal is to find the best suitable server to
> >> host a single domain with 50 million records. I am planning to install
> >> Fedora 10 x86_64 on a 32GB RAM machi
2008/12/13 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> On 13.12.08 17:09, Vinay Y S wrote:
>> I am studying the scalability and performance characteristics of
>> different DNS servers. Goal is to find the best suitable server to
>> host a single domain with 50 million records. I am planning to install
>> Fedora 10
On 13.12.08 17:09, Vinay Y S wrote:
> I am studying the scalability and performance characteristics of
> different DNS servers. Goal is to find the best suitable server to
> host a single domain with 50 million records. I am planning to install
> Fedora 10 x86_64 on a 32GB RAM machine and use the B
19 matches
Mail list logo
