Barry Margolin wrote:
> > 3. Incorrect behaviour by the resolver behind 95.102.17.107.
>
> Could it be the built-in resolver in spamming software?
That's plausible, especially in relation to MX records.
--
Ronan Flood
___
bind-users mailing list
bi
In article ,
Ronan Flood wrote:
> Barry Margolin wrote:
>
> > This suggests one of the following problems:
> >
> > 1. 95.102.17.107 is pointing to your nameserver in its resolver
> > configuration, but your server doesn't allow them to use you as a
> > resolver (the IP isn't in your allow-r
Barry Margolin wrote:
> This suggests one of the following problems:
>
> 1. 95.102.17.107 is pointing to your nameserver in its resolver
> configuration, but your server doesn't allow them to use you as a
> resolver (the IP isn't in your allow-recursion and allow-query-cache
> ACL).
>
> 2. T
ue to any problem.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Barry Margolin
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:07 PM
To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
Subject: Re: query (cache) 'coriander.plus.com/A/IN' den
In article ,
Carl Fretwell wrote:
>
> We have a domain which we serve dns for but we don't handle mail for this c=
> lient. However in the log file I can see all the time that there mail serve=
> r is trying to run a query on our dns server but is being denied.
>
> The log message
>
> 20-Mar-
5 matches
Mail list logo
