Yes and no.
Yes for static masters.
No for everything else, i.e. slaves, dynamic masters, stubs.
Mark
-
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
bind-users m
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 11.03.10 10:06, Jason Gates wrote:
When using split view, can one point to the same file in both views?
for master zones, yes, but you will have to reload it in all views
explicitly (I think that server reload should take care of that)
Ri
files took less time than updating named.conf.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf
Of Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 10:18 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.or
On 11.03.10 10:06, Jason Gates wrote:
> When using split view, can one point to the same file in both views?
for master zones, yes, but you will have to reload it in all views
explicitly (I think that server reload should take care of that)
for slave zones, I'm afraid it's not possible. You will
-users-bounces+christopher-howard=utc@lists.isc.org] On
Behalf Of Todd Snyder
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 10:10 AM
To: Jason Gates; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Split View DNS
Yes, assuming you want them to both have the same zone data.
We use a naming convention so we know when we&#x
Yes, assuming you want them to both have the same zone data.
We use a naming convention so we know when we're sharing a file. Each
view gets their zonefiles with "-viewname" (ie: example.com-internal)
appended. Common zones get "-common". This keeps us from modifying the
wrong file, and lets us
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Adam Tkac wrote:
> Btw setup with slave zone in second view is described in FAQ as well:
> - https://www.isc.org/faq/bind
> - Configuration and Setup Questions -> "How do I share a dynamic zone
> between multiple views?"
Cool, thanks for the pointer. I searched with google and
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 08:28:06PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, [iso-2022-jp] JINMEI Tatuya / � wrote:
>
> > So, you at least need to fix one on-memory zone image that can be
> > dynamically updated. You'll then have to configure the other view where
> > the "shared"
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, [iso-2022-jp] JINMEI Tatuya / wrote:
> So, you at least need to fix one on-memory zone image that can be
> dynamically updated. You'll then have to configure the other view where
> the "shared" zone is a secondary of the real dynamic zone in the other
> view, or a fo
At Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:14:32 -0800 (PST),
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> > Is your goal something like this?
> >
> > - the server has an authority for a zone, e.g., "example.com".
> > - example.com is defined for both the internal and external views, and
> > these views share the content of the exam
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, [iso-2022-jp] JINMEI Tatuya / wrote:
> Is your goal something like this?
>
> - the server has an authority for a zone, e.g., "example.com".
> - example.com is defined for both the internal and external views, and
> these views share the content of the example.com zo
At Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:51:26 -0800 (PST),
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> Is there any way to configure a dynamic zone which is shared between both
> views, where an update from a box with an "internal" ip is seen by a query
> from a box with an "external" ip, and vice versa? Short of setting up a
> co
12 matches
Mail list logo
