At Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:14:32 -0800 (PST), "Paul B. Henson" <hen...@acm.org> wrote:
> > Is your goal something like this? > > > > - the server has an authority for a zone, e.g., "example.com". > > - example.com is defined for both the internal and external views, and > > these views share the content of the example.com zone. > > - any clients can make an update to example.com, whether their IP > > address is internal or external. > > Yes, that is *exactly* what I want to do. Basically, I want that particular > zone to function as it would if I didn't have bind configured with zones > at all. Is there any way to accomplish that? I've reviewed the > configuration documentation and searched but haven't found anything > helpful. This is inherently very difficult, if not impossible. Even if you somehow work around "sharing" the zone (and/or journal) file, named still needs to have two separate memory images of the zone for these two views. And, since there is no way to keep these images consistent if you let the clients modify these separately. So, you at least need to fix one on-memory zone image that can be dynamically updated. You'll then have to configure the other view where the "shared" zone is a secondary of the real dynamic zone in the other view, or a forward zone for which all queries to be forwarded to the real zone. (I've not tried this configuration by myself, so I'm not 100% sure if this can implement what you need). --- JINMEI, Tatuya Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
