RE: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

half Of Mark Andrews Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2009 2:24 PM To: Hokumae Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour. In message <4bde94f10907132058j73504abdr790dcab27898c...@mail.gmail.com>, Hokum ae writes: > Thanks for the quick response Mark. > >

RE: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

half Of Mark Andrews Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2009 2:24 PM To: Hokumae Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour. In message <4bde94f10907132058j73504abdr790dcab27898c...@mail.gmail.com>, Hokum ae writes: > Thanks for the quick response Mark. > >

Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

Agreed. I suspect over-exuberance on the part of the network security team with either the router or the PIX config. This is a only-recent problem and I am just going to hand it back to them. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://l

Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

In message <4bde94f10907132058j73504abdr790dcab27898c...@mail.gmail.com>, Hokum ae writes: > Thanks for the quick response Mark. > > I've already tried the 10. reverse zone in the "external" view option, > and no joy (not sure why). > > I will just have to think about the Cisco config. There is

Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

Thanks for the quick response Mark. I've already tried the 10. reverse zone in the "external" view option, and no joy (not sure why). I will just have to think about the Cisco config. There is a mirrored round-robin server ring behind the router answering first-come-first-serve for several servi

Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour.

In message <4bde94f10907131945n2f22dfe6j502111e545d2a...@mail.gmail.com>, Hokum ae writes: > I host a portable class C subnet (A portable /24): 192.75.X.X > I run an instance of BIND 9.4.3_p2 on a NAT'd machine > (2.6.29-gentoo-r5): 10.10.10.10 > The NAT is handled by a Cisco 1760 > > BIND is con