I think perhaps Cisco IOS does (from the IOS online help for ip nat ): "no-payload" - "No translation of embedded address/port in the payload"
Cheers, Jason -----Original Message----- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Mark Andrews Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2009 2:24 PM To: Hokumae Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Odd PTR through cisco NAT behaviour. In message <4bde94f10907132058j73504abdr790dcab27898c...@mail.gmail.com>, Hokum ae writes: > Thanks for the quick response Mark. > > I've already tried the 10. reverse zone in the "external" view option, > and no joy (not sure why). > > I will just have to think about the Cisco config. There is a mirrored > round-robin server ring behind the router answering > first-come-first-serve for several services including DNS in the local > NAT pool.. this other option would mean having to have static entries. > > I wonder what the standard option is for this. We cant be the only > ones running DNS on a NAT network w/o exposing the servers to directly > addressable address space? Google searches of several seach > permutations have turned up nothing so far. Most NAT's don't change the query payload. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
