Re: Master and slave on same host

2011-10-11 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Casey Deccio writes: > --0016e6408196cd44f804af0ccabe > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > To answer the original poster's question. Use TSIG as has already > > been pointed out. The following change makes

Re: Master and slave on same host

2011-10-11 Thread Casey Deccio
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > To answer the original poster's question. Use TSIG as has already > been pointed out. The following change makes doing this much easier > as it allows you to send to multiple views by having multiple > address/key pairs specified in also-no

RE: Master and slave on same host

2011-10-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Bad decision on the deployment option, IMO. Not sure even what you mean >by "removed", since it's deeply integrated into all modern networking >stacks. Either you severely crippled your networking subsystem, or it's >not as "removed" as you were told it was. Disabled with all the correct measures

Re: Master and slave on same host

2011-10-11 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <4e94ab4f.9020...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes: > On 10/11/2011 4:05 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> If one view or the other communicates exclusively with other devices on > >> the same link, you could probably get away with using an IPv6 link-local > >> address, which is likely

Re: Master and slave on same host

2011-10-11 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 10/11/2011 4:05 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: If one view or the other communicates exclusively with other devices on the same link, you could probably get away with using an IPv6 link-local address, which is likely already present on your system (if you're running a modern OS), and is probably

RE: Master and slave on same host

2011-10-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>If one view or the other communicates exclusively with other devices on >the same link, you could probably get away with using an IPv6 link-local >address, which is likely already present on your system (if you're >running a modern OS), and is probably "invisible" to the other apps >you're running

Re: Master and slave on same host

2011-10-11 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 10/11/2011 1:45 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: What do you mean you can’t have additional IPs? Even if you don’t have other network connections you can use virtual IPs on a single NIC. I have one server (not DNS) that has 30 virtual IPs on a single NIC. Well, there is other software I was ho

RE: Master and slave on same host

2011-10-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>What do you mean you can’t have additional IPs? Even if you don’t >have other network connections you can use virtual IPs on a single >NIC. I have one server (not DNS) that has 30 virtual IPs on a single NIC. Well, there is other software I was hoping to avoid reconfiguring if I add a virtual

Re: Master and slave on same host

2011-10-11 Thread 风河
sure with tsig keys. 在 2011-10-11 下午9:23,"Joseph L. Casale" 写道: > I have an RHEL server running Bind 9.7 that needs to have a zone set to > master and > > slave between two views. I don’t have the luxury of an additional IP, is > this still possible > > with a single ip address? > > *

RE: Master and slave on same host

2011-10-11 Thread Lightner, Jeff
What do you mean you can’t have additional IPs? Even if you don’t have other network connections you can use virtual IPs on a single NIC. I have one server (not DNS) that has 30 virtual IPs on a single NIC. From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@li