On 5/22/2017 10:48 AM, bind-users-requ...@lists.isc.org wrote:
On 05/22/2017 07:16 AM, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
Maybe I am misinterpreting the problem. When I was managing a mixed
AD-BIND DNS scenario, ALL of the computers used the BIND servers for
their DNS resolution; none used the AD servers.
On 05/22/2017 01:36 PM, Elias Pereira wrote:
I was provisioning the AD in the wrong way. As we have our main DNS and
it is authoritative for our domain "example.com" I
needed to create a subdomain "sandom.example.com"
so that AD DNS would be authoritative only
for "samdom".
You don't have t
Hello guys, thanks for all the answers!!!
I was provisioning the AD in the wrong way. As we have our main DNS and it
is authoritative for our domain "example.com" I needed to create a
subdomain "sandom.example.com" so that AD DNS would be authoritative only
for "samdom".
Now everything is working
On 05/22/2017 07:16 AM, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
Maybe I am misinterpreting the problem. When I was managing a mixed
AD-BIND DNS scenario, ALL of the computers used the BIND servers for
their DNS resolution; none used the AD servers. But I had all of the
AD zones slaved on my BIND servers, so the
On Wed, 17 May 2017 17:44:12, Elias Pereira wrote:
Hello,
Our scenario today consists of one:
- DNS Server (Authoritative to our subdomains. Ex: www.mydomain.com*,
moodle.mydomain.com, etc)
- samba3 PDC server
- Openldap server (user base for samba)
All our IPs are public.
This scenario ab
In article ,
Elias Pereira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Our scenario today consists of one:
>
> - DNS Server (Authoritative to our subdomains. Ex: www.mydomain.com*,
> moodle.mydomain.com, etc)
> - samba3 PDC server
> - Openldap server (user base for samba)
>
> All our IPs are public.
>
> This scenar
As others have commented, more information about your config and your setup
need to be provided, before a proper troubleshooting can occur. I would add,
you should be more specific than just “resolution error”. Is it a timeout? An
NXDOMAIN? A SERVFAIL? A so-called “NODATA” response or a referral
If u 've as forwarder the dns master for such zones (meaning that dns know how
to resolve)
>check acl inside conf
>check authoritative (master dns) logs and if not
implemented , put some log channels inside conf to check
Hi Elias,
Perhaps you could post your BIND configs for the existing server and
for the new Samba4 server? Forwarders may not be exactly what you
want here - they're generally meant for recursive, rather than
authoritative traffic.
IP addresses would be helpful as well: it's always annoying when
In article , "j...@voila.fr"
wrote:
> In BIND configuration, is it possible to set the RD flag to 1, because my =
> DNS Relay receives DNS Request with RD flag to 0 and the forwarding doesn't=
> work when this flag is set to 0.
> The configuration is this one : Public DNS with delegation of
. Reed [mailto:jeremy_r...@isc.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 12:44 PM
To: ARMSTRONG, KENNETH
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: DNS forwarding not working properly?
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, ARMSTRONG, KENNETH wrote:
> Thanks, I gave that a go and now when I run a query I get "No
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, ARMSTRONG, KENNETH wrote:
> Thanks, I gave that a go and now when I run a query I get "No response
> from server" when running nslookup. I tried restarting bind and now I
> get the "rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused" error.
> I then tried running rnd
ent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 11:33 AM
To: ARMSTRONG, KENNETH
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: DNS forwarding not working properly?
You need to enable recursion in options.
/Jonathan
2009/3/26 ARMSTRONG, KENNETH :
> OK, I've been trying my hardest to figure this out.
>
> I
You need to enable recursion in options.
/Jonathan
2009/3/26 ARMSTRONG, KENNETH :
> OK, I've been trying my hardest to figure this out.
>
> I have BIND9 installed and set up as a slave to one of our Domain
> Controllers (so we can at least still get DNS if it were to go down). It
> works fine for
14 matches
Mail list logo
