On 12/30/19 12:07 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
of course.
On 30.12.19 14:30, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
The idea of an ISP telling me how to configure my DNS server causes
indigestion, possibly severe.
My registrar, the parent domain owner / operator, doesn't get to tell
me how
On 12/30/19 7:26 PM, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
On 12/30/19 6:22 PM, N6Ghost wrote:
but generally you acquire IP space in blocks not single address's.
and those blocks are what you use to build your internal and external
reverse zone files.
Agreed.
But you wouldn't be using RFC 231
On 12/30/19 6:22 PM, N6Ghost wrote:
but generally you acquire IP space in blocks not single address's.
and those blocks are what you use to build your internal and external
reverse zone files.
Agreed.
But you wouldn't be using RFC 2317 Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation
because the reverse D
On 12/30/19 1:13 PM, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
On 12/30/19 1:34 PM, N6Ghost wrote:
1: is the IP space delegated or not?
What is delegated IP space in this context?
Are you referring to a separate prefix that is routed to the customer?
This ref to the IP space that you OWN. In lar
On Monday, December 30, 2019 1:15:48 PM PST Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
> On 12/30/19 1:42 PM, N6Ghost wrote:
> > delegations are always by block... ie /20, /24, /25 etc
>
> I feel like there is term conflation.
>
> To me:
> · Delegations are DNS and are done on the dot boundary.
>
On 12/30/19 12:07 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
of course.
The idea of an ISP telling me how to configure my DNS server causes
indigestion, possibly severe.
My registrar, the parent domain owner / operator, doesn't get to tell me
how to configure my DNS server. The only thing they get
On 12/30/19 1:42 PM, N6Ghost wrote:
delegations are always by block... ie /20, /24, /25 etc
I feel like there is term conflation.
To me:
· Delegations are DNS and are done on the dot boundary.
· Routes are done on the block boundary.
The two can be related, but quite distinct.
--
Gr
On 12/30/19 1:34 PM, N6Ghost wrote:
1: is the IP space delegated or not?
What is delegated IP space in this context?
Are you referring to a separate prefix that is routed to the customer?
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
__
On Friday, December 27, 2019 12:22:55 PM PST Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 27.12.19 um 21:06 schrieb Grant Taylor via bind-users:
> >> if the ISP is willing to do and if you really own a large enough range
> >> that it makes sense is a different question, for just 3 random
> >> addresses it is unlikely
On Friday, December 27, 2019 9:49:10 AM PST Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 27.12.19 um 16:58 schrieb Grant Taylor via bind-users:
> > On 12/27/19 7:04 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> they configure it for fetching from your servers.
> >
> > I do object to this part of the statement.
> >
> > Thi
On Monday, December 30, 2019 11:07:36 AM PST Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >>I think that it should be either change local DNS or call ISP to
> >>change it, not both at once. Having both usually creates/hides
> >>different kinds of problems.
> >
> >Yes, ideally the configuration lives in one pla
On Friday, December 27, 2019 10:01:31 AM PST Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 27.12.19 um 18:58 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> The only thing that I saw was a slip in that there is something
> outside the local DNS server that needs to be configured for reverse
> DNS.
> >>
> >> Am 27.12
I think that it should be either change local DNS or call ISP to
change it, not both at once. Having both usually creates/hides
different kinds of problems.
Yes, ideally the configuration lives in one place. Multi-master is
always problematic. Particularly for day to day operations.
Initi
On 12/27/19 3:43 PM, Paul Kosinski via bind-users wrote:
P.S. Unfortunately our 2 current IPs, although adjacent, are not /31,
and thus would require 2 delegations
There's always going to be at least one record, be it an NS for
delegation or CNAME for 2317, for each IP that's not being delegat
I was pleased that I was able to get our two (successive) ISPs to set
up reverse DNS for our small number of IP addresses, and each twice to
change them when they moved us to moved us to new IP ranges (due to the
IPv4 crunch). It never even occurred to me that it might be possible to
have them dele
On 12/27/19 1:22 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
nobody out there will delegate single /255 ip's
I've had multiple different ISP's delegate reverse DNS for single IPs
(/32 or /128) multiple times.
Some used RFC 2317 Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA Delegation, others used
standard delegation.
Some ~> many
Am 27.12.19 um 21:06 schrieb Grant Taylor via bind-users:
>> if the ISP is willing to do and if you really own a large enough range
>> that it makes sense is a different question, for just 3 random
>> addresses it is unlikely to happen
>
> Agreed.
>
> But I will still ask the ISP to delegate t
On 12/27/19 10:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
in the real world they just delegate the reverse-zone to your nameserver
like it#s done for our /24 range for years
Please clarify what the "reverse-zone" is that you're talking about. Is
it "246.2.186.in-addr.arpa." or "17.246.2.186.in-addr.arpa."?
On 12/27/19 10:48 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I think that it should be either change local DNS or call ISP to change
it, not both at once. Having both usually creates/hides different kinds
of problems.
Yes, ideally the configuration lives in one place. Multi-master is
always problema
Am 27.12.19 um 18:58 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
The only thing that I saw was a slip in that there is something
outside the local DNS server that needs to be configured for reverse
DNS.
>
>> Am 27.12.19 um 18:48 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>>> I think that it should be e
The only thing that I saw was a slip in that there is something
outside the local DNS server that needs to be configured for reverse DNS.
Am 27.12.19 um 18:48 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
I think that it should be either change local DNS or call ISP to change it,
not both at once. Having b
Am 27.12.19 um 18:48 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>> The only thing that I saw was a slip in that there is something
>> outside the local DNS server that needs to be configured for reverse DNS.
>
> I think that it should be either change local DNS or call ISP to change it,
> not both at once.
Am 27.12.19 um 16:58 schrieb Grant Taylor via bind-users:
> On 12/27/19 7:04 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> they configure it for fetching from your servers.
>
> I do object to this part of the statement.
>
> This seems to imply that the ISP is a secondary DNS server and doing
> zone tra
On 12/27/19 7:04 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
there's obviously something broken in this setup. You don't have
to call the ISP if the reverse DNS changes.
On 27.12.19 08:58, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
Why do you say that?
What do you see that's broken in the OP's configuration?
On 12/27/19 7:04 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
there's obviously something broken in this setup. You don't have to
call the ISP if the reverse DNS changes.
Why do you say that?
What do you see that's broken in the OP's configuration?
I personally didn't see anything broken. Hence why r
On 27.12.19 00:27, Edouard Guigné wrote:
I have forgotten this point, rdns is done by ISP...
The same problem occured 2 years ago, and I have to call them to restart it.
there's obviously something broken in this setup. You don't have to call
the ISP if the reverse DNS changes.
Either they s
2019 00:06:03 -0300 (GFT)
Objet: Re: Problem to transfer reverse zone DNS on secondary DNS servers
On 12/26/19 7:48 PM, Edouard Guigné wrote:
> I have set a bind server for my domain "pasteur-cayenne.fr" which is
> primary authorative zone server for this domain.
"pasteur-ca
On 12/26/19 7:48 PM, Edouard Guigné wrote:
I have set a bind server for my domain "pasteur-cayenne.fr" which is
primary authorative zone server for this domain.
"pasteur-cayenne.fr" and "… this domain." are imperative.
Secondary servers for this domain are set to orange (ns6.oleane.net and
ns
Hello dear Bind Users,
I am writing to you, expecting debugging my situation, that I did not succeeded
in resolve by myself (after too much hours on google).
I have set a bind server for my domain "pasteur-cayenne.fr" which is primary
authorative zone server for this domain.
Secondary server
29 matches
Mail list logo
