On 12/27/19 10:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
in the real world they just delegate the reverse-zone to your nameserver like it#s done for our /24 range for years
Please clarify what the "reverse-zone" is that you're talking about. Is it "246.2.186.in-addr.arpa." or "17.246.2.186.in-addr.arpa."? Delegating the former will likely have undesired ramifications. Delegating the latter (and it's associated IPs) is what I prefer to do.
no need for zone transfers
I agree that there's not a /need/ for a zone transfer from the client to the ISP. However Matus indicated that he /wanted/ the zone transfer.
if the ISP is willing to do and if you really own a large enough range that it makes sense is a different question, for just 3 random addresses it is unlikely to happen
Agreed.But I will still ask the ISP to delegate the IPs to me as that's what I prefer.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
