You might want to consider using the BIND9 docker image. With docker and
kubernetes which has an internal load balancer you can run this on any
Windows platform and don't need anything special. You point to the IP
address of the kubernetes load balancer and it takes care of where to
find the do
On 09-Jun-21 18:46, Richard T.A. Neal wrote:
> Evan Hunt wrote:
>
>>> My understanding is BIND will still run fine under WSL; it's only the
>>> native Visual Studio builds that we're removing.
>>> For people who want to run named on windows, WSL seems like the best way to
>>> go.
> Sadly no. To
Evan Hunt wrote:
>> My understanding is BIND will still run fine under WSL; it's only the native
>> Visual Studio builds that we're removing.
>> For people who want to run named on windows, WSL seems like the best way to
>> go.
Sadly no. To quote myself from an earlier email on this topic:
Th
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 07:14:02PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> Certainly you tried Cygwin and WSL[*]. What's wrong with them?
> (Isn't Windows a kind of Unix any more? ;-)
My understanding is BIND will still run fine under WSL; it's only the
native Visual Studio builds that we're removing.
On Fri 04/Jun/2021 22:51:01 +0200 Ondřej Surý wrote:
And if I had to answer the question whether I and my team should
spend time improving BIND 9 just for everybody or invest the precious
time into fixing yet another incompatibility between POSIX/SUSv2 and
Windows world, I think the answer would
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021, Reindl Harald wrote:
besides that - i didn't hear a serious reasoning for a native named
binary on windows these days and given there are tons of ways running a
linux binary compared to 20 years ago i call it a waste of time
* more complex code implies more errors
some e
Am 05.06.21 um 19:15 schrieb Ondřej Surý:
Folks, I would appreciate if we can say on the topic. Specifically, I consider
this rhetorical discussion on the meaning of the word “portable” neither useful
to the subscribers of this list nor productive.
besides that - i didn't hear a serious rea
Folks, I would appreciate if we can say on the topic. Specifically, I consider
this rhetorical discussion on the meaning of the word “portable” neither useful
to the subscribers of this list nor productive.
Thanks,
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be dif
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:58:40 -0700
Gregory Sloop wrote:
> This feels a lot like responding to trolls, but I'll instead assume that
> you're asking (or making a point) in good faith.
>
> So, we'll stipulate that - you're actually interested in truth and knowledge.
>
> So, it's easily compiled on
> Peter,
>
>
> do you seriously think that this word play is going to help the BIND 9
> support for Windows? So, I am asking you, what’s your serious
> proposal what should we do?
>
You may regard it as a word play but I am being very serious indeed.
I have looked high up and low down for a defin
REALLY, it is
From: bind-users on behalf of Ondřej Surý
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 11:39 PM
To: Eric Germann
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: No more support for windows
What I’ve heard is that the geoip/maxmindb is the deal breaker,
but on
urity
From: bind-users on behalf of Eric Germann
via bind-users
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 11:31 PM
To: Greg Sloop
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: No more support for windows
Call me naive, but I’m trying to figure out what the corner case is to use BIND
on Windows.
F
What I’ve heard is that the geoip/maxmindb is the deal breaker,
but on general level, I concur that MS-DNS is a good choice for
Windows Server deployments.
I am a big fan of picking the right tool for the job.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ond...@isc.org
> On 4. 6. 2021, at 23:31, Eric Germann
Call me naive, but I’m trying to figure out what the corner case is to use BIND
on Windows.
For an internal network Windows Server already has a name server that
integrates with AD and everything else needed to run a Windows network.
Support for DDNS is a lot easier, it has tons of SRV records
This feels a lot like responding to trolls, but I'll instead assume that you're
asking (or making a point) in good faith.
So, we'll stipulate that - you're actually interested in truth and knowledge.
So, it's easily compiled on Mac, Unix, FreeBSD, Linux, SunOS, RaspPi, etc.
And it compiles on a
Peter,
do you seriously think that this word play is going to help the BIND 9
support for Windows? So, I am asking you, what’s your serious
proposal what should we do?
I’ve had asked if people are willing to invest time, effort or money
into keeping the Windows support alive. I would rather accep
What I find ironic is that here:
https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/blob/main/README.md
the very first line says:
"BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain) is a complete, highly portable
implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocol."
If this were truly the case, BIND would work
Well its clearly not working so it needs to change just like DDNS is
free but you can paid for a subscription thats easy to do or SSL is free
for 90days but you have the option to pay easily for a year but that
might not work for bind for windows so it needs to be a subscription to
run it at le
Do you understand how ironic is for you to complain about “subscription is not
going to happen” while **every** email on the mailing list has this note in the
footer:
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
On 04/06/2021 6:05 pm, John Thurston wrote:
On 6/4/2021 8:48 AM, Peter via bind-users wrote:
When people find out2024 is the year bind is no longer supported for
windows people aregoing to be upset this all seems to be done quietly
nothing posted on the the isc.org site about this just how many
When people find out2024 is the year bind is no longer supported for
windows people aregoing to be upset this all seems to be done quietly
nothing posted on the the isc.org site about this just how many people
depend on bind for windows will be shocking.
21 matches
Mail list logo
