On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:58:40 -0700 Gregory Sloop <gr...@sloop.net> wrote:
> This feels a lot like responding to trolls, but I'll instead assume that > you're asking (or making a point) in good faith. > > So, we'll stipulate that - you're actually interested in truth and knowledge. > > So, it's easily compiled on Mac, Unix, FreeBSD, Linux, SunOS, RaspPi, etc. > And it compiles on a huge range of hardware, CPU's etc. > > I'd consider that highly portable. I'd consider it moderately portable. Among Open Source software, I'd consider the following highly portable: Firefox, Chromium, LibreOffice, Thunderbird, Claws-Mail, Scribus, Inkscape, Gimp, Krita, VLC, QT(!) and who knows how many others that run on Unix-like systems *and* on Windows. And among closed source software, Chrome is obviously highly portable (by Google), and Acrobat Reader and Flash (RIP) are highly portable (by Adobe). P.S. I am not a fan of Windows, but it is widespread, and many people even use it for Internet servers. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
