In message
, Casey Deccio writes:
> --0016e6408196cd44f804af0ccabe
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > To answer the original poster's question. Use TSIG as has already
> > been pointed out. The following change makes
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> To answer the original poster's question. Use TSIG as has already
> been pointed out. The following change makes doing this much easier
> as it allows you to send to multiple views by having multiple
> address/key pairs specified in also-no
>Bad decision on the deployment option, IMO. Not sure even what you mean
>by "removed", since it's deeply integrated into all modern networking
>stacks. Either you severely crippled your networking subsystem, or it's
>not as "removed" as you were told it was.
Disabled with all the correct measures
In message <4e94ab4f.9020...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes:
> On 10/11/2011 4:05 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >> If one view or the other communicates exclusively with other devices on
> >> the same link, you could probably get away with using an IPv6 link-local
> >> address, which is likely
On 10/11/2011 4:05 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
If one view or the other communicates exclusively with other devices on
the same link, you could probably get away with using an IPv6 link-local
address, which is likely already present on your system (if you're
running a modern OS), and is probably
>If one view or the other communicates exclusively with other devices on
>the same link, you could probably get away with using an IPv6 link-local
>address, which is likely already present on your system (if you're
>running a modern OS), and is probably "invisible" to the other apps
>you're running
On 10/11/2011 1:45 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What do you mean you can’t have additional IPs? Even if you don’t
have other network connections you can use virtual IPs on a single
NIC. I have one server (not DNS) that has 30 virtual IPs on a single NIC.
Well, there is other software I was ho
>What do you mean you can’t have additional IPs? Even if you don’t
>have other network connections you can use virtual IPs on a single
>NIC. I have one server (not DNS) that has 30 virtual IPs on a single NIC.
Well, there is other software I was hoping to avoid reconfiguring if I add a
virtual
sure with tsig keys.
在 2011-10-11 下午9:23，"Joseph L. Casale" 写道：
> I have an RHEL server running Bind 9.7 that needs to have a zone set to
> master and
>
> slave between two views. I don’t have the luxury of an additional IP, is
> this still possible
>
> with a single ip address?
>
> *
@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Joseph L. Casale
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 9:17 AM
To: 'bind-users@lists.isc.org'
Subject: Master and slave on same host
I have an RHEL server running Bind 9.7 that needs to have a zone set
I have an RHEL server running Bind 9.7 that needs to have a zone set to master
and
slave between two views. I don't have the luxury of an additional IP, is this
still possible
with a single ip address?
Thanks!
jlc
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
