Thanks to all of you for the great advice and insights! Everything is
working now, it was a combination of different issues and the advice
i received was invaluable to solving the issues.
Thanks again!
dalton
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
wrote:
> Hi Dalton,
>
dalton stickney wrote:
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;sccnj04.example.com. IN NS
So, you ask for sccnj04.example.com, but apparantly that's not what you
have in your zonefile:
> $ORIGIN sccnj04.example.com.
> sccnj04 IN NS sip.example.com.
The $ORIG
Hi Dalton,
Tue, 24 May 2011 10:09:00 -0700 dalton stickney wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have set up a simple bind config to test this. I am very obviously
> missing something simple here, but i can't figure out what it is for
> some reason.
> I am trying to delegate name servers for the subdomain
> s
Hi all.
I have set up a simple bind config to test this. I am very obviously
missing something simple here, but i can't figure out what it is for
some reason.
I am trying to delegate name servers for the subdomain
sccnj04.example.com to ns sip.example.com.
When i dig i get no error, but also no a
Hi Dalton,
Sun, 22 May 2011 17:27:17 -0700 dalton stickney wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
> See output of commands below:
>
>> Please run these two commands and show us the results:
>> dig @ns1.company.com. stor.company.com. soa +noal +comm +answ
>
> [dstickney@lw-lts-155 ~]$ dig @ns1.company.
Thanks for the reply.
See output of commands below:
> Please run these two commands and show us the results:
> dig @ns1.company.com. stor.company.com. soa +noal +comm +answ
[dstickney@lw-lts-155 ~]$ dig @ns1.company.com stor.company.com. soa
+noal +comm +answ
; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.
Hi Dalton,
Sun, 22 May 2011 15:04:02 -0700 dalton stickney wrote:
> Hi, thanks for the quick replies.
> I apologize for the HTML, and the vagueness of the original post.
> (this is my first time posting to this list) Let me give some more
> specifics here:
>
> This is the zone file for stor.com
Hi, thanks for the quick replies.
I apologize for the HTML, and the vagueness of the original post.
(this is my first time posting to this list) Let me give some more
specifics here:
This is the zone file for stor.company.com, so i am trying to delegate
subdomain.stor.company.com to the nameserver
> Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 13:36:43 -0700
> From: dalton stickney
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
> Hello all
> ,
> I have what may be an easy question here, but it's been a while since I did
> much with Bind, so I'm not entirely sure if I'm doing something wrong here.
>
Hi Dalton,
Sun, 22 May 2011 13:36:43 -0700 dalton stickney wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have what may be an easy question here, but it's been a while since
> I did much with Bind, so I'm not entirely sure if I'm doing something
> wrong here.
>
> What I'm trying to do, should be relatively simple i t
Please don't use HTML mail for technical mailing lists. It made replying
to this message ridiculously more difficult than necessary.
On 05/22/2011 13:36, dalton stickney wrote:
subdomain.stor.company.com IN NS sip.stor.company.com.
stor.company.com IN NS ns2.company.com.
stor.company.com IN
Hello all
,
I have what may be an easy question here, but it's been a while since I did
much with Bind, so I'm not entirely sure if I'm doing something wrong here.
What I'm trying to do, should be relatively simple i think, but for some
reason i cannot get it to work. I'm trying to delegate a subd
In article ,
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> Actually I just found what caused it not to work ; I have forwarders
> set ; If I comment-out the forwarders line ; then everything work as
> it should
>
> Can't delegation works if forwarders are enabled ?
No. When you have forwarders configured, it me
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:55:07PM +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> Hi there..
>
> I'm trying to create a delegation to a sub-domain ; for some reasons
> I'm getting no-where
>
> I have a domain.com zone ; I'd like to delegate mel.domain.com to
> another dns server (windows server DNS fwiw)
> He
On Feb 4, 2011, at 3:25 AM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> Actually I just found what caused it not to work ; I have forwarders
> set ; If I comment-out the forwarders line ; then everything work as
> it should
>
> Can't delegation works if forwarders are enabled ?
Only if either (a) the forwarders
Dnia 2011-02-04 23:16 Jean-Yves Avenard napisał(a):
>Hi
>
>On 4 February 2011 22:54, Eivind Olsen wrote:
>
>> Unless I'm misunderstanding something, it should work. Here's an extract
>> from the BIND 9.7 ARM, section 6.2.16.2:
>>
>> "Forwarding occurs only on those queries for which the server i
On 4 February 2011 12:28, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
> I changed:
not sure how forwarders fixed this but looking at your zone it is
because you have reset your ORIGIN and not put a fuul stop at the end
of the ad record
domain.com. IN SOA m.domain.com. domainmaster.domain.com. (
Hi
On 4 February 2011 22:54, Eivind Olsen wrote:
> Unless I'm misunderstanding something, it should work. Here's an extract
> from the BIND 9.7 ARM, section 6.2.16.2:
>
> "Forwarding occurs only on those queries for which the server is not
> authoritative and does not have the answer in its cach
> mel A 192.168.0.3
> ; NS ad.domain.com
You are already defining an A record for "mel". I'd try commenting that
one out when you put the NS line back in (and make sure to give that NS
line a name of its own then, since it can then no longer piggyback
On 4 February 2011 22:51, Balder wrote:
> not sure how forwarders fixed this but looking at your zone it is
> because you have reset your ORIGIN and not put a fuul stop at the end
> of the ad record
> ;=as there is no dit at the end of ad.domain.com this will
> become. put a full stop at
> Actually I just found what caused it not to work ; I have forwarders
> set ; If I comment-out the forwarders line ; then everything work as
> it should
> Can't delegation works if forwarders are enabled ?
Unless I'm misunderstanding something, it should work. Here's an extract
from the BIND 9.7
Just re read that message and it didn't make too much sense so will try again
as there is no full stop at the end of the following line
; NS ad.domain.com
it would end up looking like this
;domain.com NS ad.domain.com.domain.com
if you put a full stop at the end of th
I changed:
zone "domain.com" {
type master;
file "internal/db.domain.com";
check-names ignore;
notify TRUE;
allow-update { key "rndc-key"; };
};
to:
zone "domain.com" {
type master;
file "internal/db.domain.com";
check-names ignore;
Hi
On 4 February 2011 22:15, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> General rule with Unix daemons: always read the log. You'll find the
> error message.
>
> BIND-specific rule: test your zone with named-checkzone.
no errors of any kind are reported, in the log nor by named-checkzone
>
> Here, I suggest
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 09:55:07PM +1100,
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote
a message of 112 lines which said:
> Now if I uncomment the NS ad.domain.com. mel.domain.com will not
> resolve anymore:
General rule with Unix daemons: always read the log. You'll find the
error message.
BIND-specific rule: t
Hi there..
I'm trying to create a delegation to a sub-domain ; for some reasons
I'm getting no-where
I have a domain.com zone ; I'd like to delegate mel.domain.com to
another dns server (windows server DNS fwiw)
Here is my zone file:
$ORIGIN .
$TTL 7200 ; 2 hours
domain.com. IN
Also you did not *buy* the addresses from RIPE as RIPE does not *sell*
addresses. You leased the addressed from RIPE.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
__
t; Regards,
>
> Alans
>
>
>
> *From:* bind-users-bounces+batpower83=yahoo.co...@lists.isc.org [mailto:
> bind-users-bounces+batpower83 =
> yahoo.co...@lists.isc.org] *On Behalf Of *Peter Andreev
> *Sent:* Monday, January 25, 2010 12:15 PM
> *To:* BIND Users Mailing List
Behalf
Of Peter Andreev
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 12:15 PM
To: BIND Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Delegation question!
Have you requested delegation?
2010/1/25 Alans
Hello,
When I check our dns ip from external server for ptr records it shows
nothing but
93.in-addr.arpa.6562
Have you requested delegation?
2010/1/25 Alans
> Hello,
>
> When I check our dns ip from external server for ptr records it shows
> nothing but
> 93.in-addr.arpa.6562IN SOA ns-pri.ripe.net.
> dns-help.ripe.net. 2010012534 3600 7200 1209600 7200
> We bought 93.x.x.0/x from RI
Hello,
When I check our dns ip from external server for ptr records it shows
nothing but
93.in-addr.arpa.6562IN SOA ns-pri.ripe.net.
dns-help.ripe.net. 2010012534 3600 7200 1209600 7200
We bought 93.x.x.0/x from RIPE, does that mean that RIPE didn't delegate
93.x.x.0/x to us?
31 matches
Mail list logo
