sustain
a little downtime.
Good luck,
RW
From: bind-users on behalf of Fred Morris
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 2:11 PM
To: Bind-users
Subject: Re: Bind and DHCP
This email originated from outside of TESLA
Do not click links or open attachments unless
of people are invested in solutionism via centralization so this is
inherently controversial.
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025, Karol Nowicki via bind-users wrote:
Does a good practice recommend to split running ISC Bind and DHCP into
two different machines or make DNS+DHCP running on same server is
allowed
remember any time I cared about the DHCP server's
IP in the last two decades, other than DHCP helpers / forwarders.
I'm sure there are some edge cases that I'm not thinking of. I'd be
curious to learn edge cases others have run into.
As others have said, running BIND and
+1 for Greg's suggestion.
You may want those services co-hosted today. But if you want to separate
them next year, your life will be easier if they had unique IP addresses
from the start.
--
Do things because you should, not just because you can.
John Thurston907-465-8591
john.thurs...@a
g> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Does a good practice recommend to split running ISC Bind and DHCP into two
> different machines or make DNS+DHCP running on same server is allowed ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Wysłane z Yahoo Mail do iPhone
> <https://mai
On 08.01.25 15:34, Karol Nowicki via bind-users wrote:
Does a good practice recommend to split running ISC Bind and DHCP into two
different machines or make DNS+DHCP running on same server is allowed ?
you can run both on the same server. If you ran, run them both on multiple
machines to
Hello
Does a good practice recommend to split running ISC Bind and DHCP into two
different machines or make DNS+DHCP running on same server is allowed ?
Thanks
Wysłane z Yahoo Mail do iPhone
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds
7 matches
Mail list logo
