Hi Karol.
You can run them both together, if you like. I think it comes down to a
personal choice between economics, simplicity, cleanliness of design and
performance. If you want your DNS server to handle many 1,000 QPS it might
be better dedicating resource to that and put Kea (I assume Kea?) on a
different box.

Try it and see. Personally I would use different addresses for DNS and DHCP
service, just to make it easy to know which is which.

I'm sure there will be many opinions :)
Cheers, Greg

On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 15:35, Karol Nowicki via bind-users <
bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:

> Hello
>
> Does a good practice recommend to split running ISC Bind and DHCP into two
> different machines or make DNS+DHCP running on same server is allowed ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Wysłane z Yahoo Mail do iPhone
> <https://mail.onelink.me/107872968?pid=nativeplacement&c=Global_Acquisition_YMktg_315_Internal_EmailSignature&af_sub1=Acquisition&af_sub2=Global_YMktg&af_sub3=&af_sub4=100000604&af_sub5=EmailSignature__Static_>
> --
> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
> from this list
>
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
> information.
>
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to