rom any source other than zone transfers?
Thanks.
--
Gordon A. Lang / 313-819-7978
- Original Message -
From: mli...@zoominternet.net
To: Chris Buxton ; bind-users@lists.isc.org ; Gordon A. Lang
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Bind Clustering
One thing yo
obtained so that I can evaluate what it would take for me to write
my own
modifications.
Thanks.
--
Gordon A. Lang
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Buxton"
To: "Gordon A. Lang" ;
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:22 PM
Subject: Re: Bind Clustering
> Updat
gt; modifications.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Gordon A. Lang
>
> - Original Message - From: "Chris Buxton" <
> chris.p.bux...@gmail.com>
> To: "Gordon A. Lang" ;
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:22 PM
>
> Subject: Re: Bind Clustering
&g
don A. Lang" ;
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 11:22 PM
Subject: Re: Bind Clustering
Updates are always forwarded to the zone masters, as configured in the
zone statement itself. And yes, the update is only forwarded
(successfully) once.
BIND assumes that each zone has exactly one "primary
am
> incorrectly reading into it, but if you could clarify that point, I would
> appreciate it. --- I would expect that if the masters list is used, then
> ALL masters should always get the updates.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> Gordon A. Lang
>
> - O
t point, I would
appreciate it. --- I would expect that if the masters list is used, then
ALL masters should always get the updates.
Thanks in advance.
--
Gordon A. Lang
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Andrews"
To: "Gordon A. Lang"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 5
In message , "Gordon
A. Lang" writes:
> Regarding my wild idea for synchronizing mulitiple dynamic masters..
> my idea is flawed.
>
> Evidently, the "allow-update-forwarding" only forwards to the MNAME
> configured in the SOA. I was thinking it forwarded to the masters
> configured in the conf
Regarding my wild idea for synchronizing mulitiple dynamic masters..
my idea is flawed.
Evidently, the "allow-update-forwarding" only forwards to the MNAME
configured in the SOA. I was thinking it forwarded to the masters
configured in the conf file. Oh well. I guess we'll just have to
wait fo
On Apr 8, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:46:04AM -0500,
Michael Hare wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
Doesn't DDNS rely on a single SOA? If so, is there a best practice
on how to deal with this?
Are you sure the OP uses dynamic udpates? It
Arnoud wrote:
> We use bind for DNS.
> At the moment we have one primary server that delegates updates to it`s two
> slave servers.
>
> Since everything nowadays is dependant on DNS I would like to cluster my
> primary server in case of a hardware failure or error.
>
> So, how do I setup two pr
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:46:04AM -0500,
Michael Hare wrote
a message of 29 lines which said:
> Doesn't DDNS rely on a single SOA? If so, is there a best practice
> on how to deal with this?
Are you sure the OP uses dynamic udpates? It is not obvious from his
message.
In that case, yes, he
Doesn't DDNS rely on a single SOA? If so, is there a best practice on
how to deal with this?
-Michael
On 4/8/2010 9:15 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:18:33PM +0200,
Arnoud Tijssen wrote
a message of 14 lines which said:
Since everything nowadays is dependant
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:18:33PM +0200,
Arnoud Tijssen wrote
a message of 14 lines which said:
> Since everything nowadays is dependant on DNS I would like to
> cluster my primary server in case of a hardware failure or error.
Why? I really do not see your point. You have three authoritativ
.
Furthermore, introduce load-balancers to mask the clusters.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsync
HTH
- Original Message
From: Arnoud Tijssen
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 7:18:33 AM
Subject: Bind Clustering
We use bind for DNS.
At the moment w
We use bind for DNS.
At the moment we have one primary server that delegates updates to it`s two
slave servers.
Since everything nowadays is dependant on DNS I would like to cluster my
primary server in case of a hardware failure or error.
So, how do I setup two primary bind servers that keep e
15 matches
Mail list logo
