Doesn't DDNS rely on a single SOA? If so, is there a best practice on
how to deal with this?
-Michael
On 4/8/2010 9:15 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:18:33PM +0200,
Arnoud Tijssen<atijs...@ram.nl> wrote
a message of 14 lines which said:
Since everything nowadays is dependant on DNS I would like to
cluster my primary server in case of a hardware failure or error.
Why? I really do not see your point. You have three authoritative name
servers (the master and two slaves), presumably in different
locations. Isn't it enough? If no, you can still add slaves.
So, how do I setup two primary bind servers that keep each other in
sync one way or the other.
Slaves keep in synch automatically.
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
