Re: several master ip's for a slave zone

How does this feature address the risk that data provided by one master might get overwritten by another? Regards, Kalpesh On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > On 03/11/2011 23:14, hugo hugoo wrote: > > Hi Hugo, > > > I have seen that for a slave zone, it is possible to confi

Re: bind 9.6-esv-r1 segfault

Hi, I seem to have hit the same issue on Bind 9.7.3. === [Test environment] === - The issued system is cache server. It does not have a zone which it can respond as a master server. - The server which receives a recursive query asks a recursive query from root server to the last server in order

Re: SPF implementation schedule.

Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Eivind Olsen wrote: > kalpesh varyani wrote: > > > Does ISC implement SPF for server or client side currently? > > If yes, then where to get the libraries; if not then what is the > > scheduled date/release for implementation? > > I'm

SPF implementation schedule.

Hi, As per the ARM document for bind9.7, ISC has provided support for new RR(resource record) types including SPF. Comparison of code of Bind9.3 and Bind9.7 suggests that new libraries (at src\lib\dns) have been provided for SPF identification. However, either the function definitions are absent o

Re: Deallocating memory in isc code.

create*, can > it cause memory leak? > 2. what should be the rerurn value of *isc_mem_strdup()* on success/failure? > > Regards, > Kalpesh On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message , kalpesh > varyani writes: > > Hi, > > > > Is

Deallocating memory in isc code.

Hi, Is it necessary to deallocate memory assigned using isc_mem_get() by explicitly using isc_mem_free()? Ref: File builtin.c is available at ftp://1node.net/linux/bind-9.7.0b1/bin/named/*builtin*.*c* Following is the code snippet: static

2038 problem and BIND.

Hi Experts, I would just like to know, how BIND takes care of the 2038 problem. Since now DNSSEC has a lot to do with timings, there could be issues if someone would set the signature expiry time to a large value (possibly after Y2K38). This can create problems, if care is not taken in BIND code.

Switching to TCP in BIND.

Hi all, Please let me know if there is some feature in any of the versions of BIND, by which it switches to TCP when it detects spoofed replies. I am aware that BIND uses UDP for all its query / response and TCP for zone transfers. Regards, Kalpesh __

Re: Different handling of referrals by dig and nslookup

:57 PM, Dave Sparro wrote: > On 2/13/2010 9:42 PM, kalpesh varyani wrote: > >> Hi Rick, >> >> I am aware that it is a somewhat odd (but not incorrect, am I right ?) to >> put a non-recursive name server in the resolv.conf but I am not able to >> understand the b

Re: Different handling of referrals by dig and nslookup

Hi Doug, Please find my response inline. On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 02/13/10 18:42, kalpesh varyani wrote: > >> Hi Rick, >> >> I am aware that it is a somewhat odd (but not incorrect, am I right ?) >> to put a non-recursive

Re: Different handling of referrals by dig and nslookup

first one fails even in the case of ping and dig. This is what, I think, one would expect from a resolver. Can you please put some light? Regards, Kalpesh. On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Rick Dicaire wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:07 PM, kalpesh varyani > wrote: > > From a t

Different handling of referrals by dig and nslookup

Hi all, I have named 9.4.3-P3 running on 2 linux systems(A & B). A has recursion disabled and the B has recursion enabled. >From a third linux system, I try name resolution using dig or nslookup. In this system, I have resolv.conf as: nameserver A nameserver B When I try to resolve names, using

Workaround for 'rndc stop' ?

Hi all, Can anyone please tell me is there any other command by which i can stop the name-server without loosing the recent updates. I know that I can do this by issuing 'rndc stop' but for some reason I am not able to . What are the different ways by which I can have the same benefits as t

named does not shutdown properly while 'rndc stop'

Hi All , I have three DNS servers which are running ISC BIND version 9.4.3-P3. I have observed named hang when trying to shutdown the nameserver using "rndc stop" from time to time (once in two weeks). I shutdown my DNS servers each night and sometimes my named faces this hang. At that time , I

name.c: INSIST(nlabels == name->labels) failed

Hi All, while doing the following task in parallel, 1,Sending a query 2,dumping cache 3,Flush cache data periodical I am seeing below error in log. *name.c: INSIST(nlabels == name->labels) failed* and then core-dump happened. Could any of seen this type of Error? what is the issue here? re

named and chroot

Hi All, I am running "named" in chroot() ENV. I am seeing below errors on PA-risc system. = Warning: crypto library not found, DNSSEC functionality not available libcrypto :Exec format error. =

Connect returns EINPROGRESS

Hi all, I am using HPUX 11.23 and looking into the socket.c code of bind-9.4.3-P3. Following is the code for isc_socket_connect() in the file: isc_result_t isc_socket_connect(isc_socket_t *sock, isc_sockaddr_t *addr, isc_task_t *task, isc_taskaction_t action, const void *arg)

Re: Recursive Query.

e we have same code for the success retrun from the connect and also connect retrun "*EINPROGRESS" i.e. cc *==0, it means that we are not taking care of the "EINPROGRESS". Regards Dinesh. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:48 AM, kalpesh varyani wrote: > thanks for reply. >

Re: Recursive Query.

; > Kevin Darcy wrote: > > Well, you could file a bug report, but I'm not aware of this error > > happening on other platforms, so it might end up being a kernel issue of > > some sort. > > > > > > - Kevin > > &

Re: Recursive Query.

running on, or what version of BIND, it's > kind of hard to troubleshoot further than that. > > - > Kevin > > kalpesh varyani wrote: > >> thanks for your quick reply >> I am seen below error msg " once per 60sec" and no seen any query >> failure. >

Re: Recursive Query.

1, 2009 at 10:14 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2009, at 12:39 PM, kalpesh varyani wrote: > > Hi, > > I have below configuration. > > DNS server1 -- Forwarder > > DNS server2-- Authoritative > > I am seeing following errors on server1. >

Recursive Query.

Hi, I have below configuration. DNS server1 -- Forwarder DNS server2-- Authoritative I am seeing following errors on server1. general: error: internal_send: 192.168.2.222#53: Destination address required general: error: /lib/isc/unix/errno2result.c:116: unexpected