Hi Rick, I am aware that it is a somewhat odd (but not incorrect, am I right ?) to put a non-recursive name server in the resolv.conf but I am not able to understand the behavioral difference of ping/dig and nslookup.
But logically shouldn't it be moving to the next name server when the first one fails even in the case of ping and dig. This is what, I think, one would expect from a resolver. Can you please put some light? Regards, Kalpesh. On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Rick Dicaire <kri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:07 PM, kalpesh varyani > <kalpesh.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From a third linux system, I try name resolution using dig or nslookup. > > In this system, I have resolv.conf as: > > > > nameserver A > > nameserver B > > Just out of curiosity, why do you have a non recursing name server in > resolv.conf? > > -- > aRDy Music and Rick Dicaire present: > http://www.ardynet.com > http://www.ardynet.com:9000/ardymusic.ogg.m3u >
_______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
