On 26 zones I don’t think the load will be a problem. A few seconds on reload
time won’t affect me one way or the other. Regardless, I have changed the
webmin command to rndc reload.
Jeff
> On Apr 14, 2015, at 6:05 PM, Stuart Browne
> wrote:
>
>> On 14.04.15 07:36, SH De
Like what? I’ve never had any issues.
Jeff
> On Apr 13, 2015, at 12:27 PM, Emil Natan wrote:
>
> > in other words: if you everytime you change the config hard restart
> > named instead a reload you are doing it terrible wrong with a ton of bad
> > side effects
For me, it’s in the interest of keeping clean easy to read log files. Seems
like this info should be available to turn on and off when needed for
debugging, not every time the config is changed.
Jeff
> On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Alan Clegg wrote:
>
> On 4/13/15 2:08 AM, SH De
Is there a way to suppress the build information in the log every time BIND
restarts/reloads? I’m getting:
built with '--build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' '--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu'
'--target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' '--program-prefix=' '--prefix=/usr'
'--exec-prefix=/usr' '--bindir=/usr/bi
I just started noticing these in my log:
7/21/13 11:33:13 PM named[355] 21-Jul-2013 23:33:13.646 general:
warning: zone domain.com/IN: 'domain.com' found SPF/TXT record but no SPF/SPF
record found, add matching type SPF record
The zone does have an SPF record. I'm not sure I understan
aster than it has been for a long time.
Jeff
On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:33 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 26.06.13 20:16, SH Development wrote:
>> Whoa...slow down guys. I took ns2.starionhost.net offline and am in the
>> middle of re-arranging my secondary services. Let
ing to be a
> dick...I'm genuinely curious what the reasoning behind that was. :)
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:39 PM, SH Development
> wrote:
>> Sure could use some direction about where to start looking. I "thought" I
>> had everything working for the las
, at 11:53 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Yes, seems fine now. Can you share more information about what it was you
> turned off? Sounds odd, but the results speak for themselves.
>
> Doug
>
>
> On 06/26/2013 09:39 PM, SH Development wrote:
>> Sure could use some direc
could you
try your test again now, now that I've shut off the potentially offending
program?
Jeff
On Jun 26, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 06:50 PM, SH Development wrote:
>> Okay, so I got to it sooner than I thought. So, could you take a look at:
&g
Okay, so I got to it sooner than I thought. So, could you take a look at:
starionhost.net
stariontech.com
starionline.com
Any one of those, but they should all be identical now and on some new
secondary DNS.
Jeff
On Jun 26, 2013, at 8:16 PM, SH Development wrote:
> Whoa...slow down g
2013, at 12:38 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
>>>> Do you have a box such as a firewall or load-balancer sitting in
>>>> front of
>>>> ns1?
>>
>> On 26.06.13 01:46, SH Development wrote:
>>> No, the box is hanging right off the internet on a static
bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of SH
> Development
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 8:35 PM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Secondary DNS question...
>
> All very interesting, but I'm af
All very interesting, but I'm afraid at my level of expertise on DNS, I'm not
following. If I'm broken, how do I attempt to fix? Someone mentioned that our
ns1.starionhost.net was not authoritative. How does one even decide that? As
far as I know I haven't had any issues until now...
Jeff
:
> On 20.06.13 23:02, SH Development wrote:
>> I agree that the incoming and outgoing are different issues. I just
>> mention it because I dealt with issues on both fronts today. The few
>> claims that I had about email not being delivered were proved false by
>> rev
general info: outside MXes use authoritative DNS to send to
> you; your incoming MX servers use recursive DNS to do any reverse lookups on
> sender IPs, to query DNSBLs, and to get SPF/DKIM/DMARC info; outgoing MXes
> use recursive DNS to find outside MXes.
>
> John
>
>
Our secondary DNS machine went down (and unnoticed for 24 hours).
Today, we had multiple people calling about email that hadn't come in, and
trouble with outgoing emails not going out.
Our primary DNS was up the whole time. So my question is, why would my
secondary being down, and only my prim
16 matches
Mail list logo
