> I have configured qname to disabled for now. Once the issue is resolved,
> I will set it to relaxed. I have provided a download link for the log
> files and a dig +trace test for more details on this issue, which I do
> not think is related to BIND or its configuration.
Sami,
Discussions of non
>> Hello Michael
>> Thank you for your response. Here is a pcap file and some logs.
>
> Hello Sami,
>
> Your pcap shows your resolver making thousands of queries that get
> no responses (or at least the pcap does not contain them). There's
> not much I can say, beyond that this does not appear to
> Hello Michael
> Thank you for your response. Here is a pcap file and some logs.
Hello Sami,
Your pcap shows your resolver making thousands of queries that get no responses
(or at least the pcap does not contain them). There's not much I can say,
beyond that this does not appear to be a proble
> Yes, sure. I grabbed three typical cases to analyze further, and
> currently trying to understand the proceedings - unsuccessfully, up
> to now. :(
>
> Case 1:
> ---
> Jun 19 17:42:12 conr named[24481]: lame-servers:
>info: success resolving '26.191.165.185.in-addr.arpa/PTR'
>
along with the BIND log segment which contains the
failed queries.
Michael Batchelder
ISC Support
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.
Thomas,
I just incorrectly wrote:
> So at minimum add "icmp and arp" to your filter expression.
I did not mean to use the logical "and". Your minimum filter should be
something like:
"src port 53 or icmp or arp"
Sorry for the confusion,
Michael
limit the amount of
information you provide to those who are trying to help you or make them infer
information. It's fine to mention only certain packets in an email, but put the
full packet capture on a public resource somewhere accessible.
Michael Batchelder
ISC Support
--
Visit https:
(or some level of
failure in between all queries and the ones for that one domain)? And at that
time, can you successfully query from the same system using a public resolver
(e.g. "dig @9.9.9.9 s1._domainkey.mg-esp-prod-eu-eu.mallorcazeitung.es TXT")?
And do you have BIND's
8 matches
Mail list logo