Re: Multiple views (more than 2)

2025-04-18 Thread Marek Kozlowski
nt view. Maintaining multiple versions will be a big overhead and, IMHO, this way madness lies. If it were my network I'd advise the team who designed this application to rethink their delivery mechanism. so that the requirement for one_name == multiple IPs goes away. /soapbox If you

Re: Multiple views (more than 2)

2025-04-15 Thread Marek Kozlowski
192.168.127.1 printer IN A 192.168.1.1 ldapIN A 172.16.1.16 ; etc ; On 4/15/25 8:43 AM, Marek Kozlowski wrote: OK, 1. The sceniario: For the clients: 192.168.1/24: nfs.mydomain -> 192.168.12

Re: Multiple views (more than 2)

2025-04-15 Thread Marek Kozlowski
ss lies. If it were my network I'd advise the team who designed this application to rethink their delivery mechanism. so that the requirement for one_name == multiple IPs goes away. /soapbox If you absolutely *must* do this, some actual examples would help please, rather than generalisat

Re: Multiple views (more than 2)

2025-04-14 Thread Marek Kozlowski
t both ends so that the secondary includes the key for a zone when making its transfer request and the primary uses that to select the correct zone from the appropriate view. End clients/stub resolvers don't typically use keys. I hope this helps. Cheers, Greg On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 at 14:12

Multiple views (more than 2)

2025-04-14 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) There are 4 name servers for my domain: two internal ones (my CIDR, managed by me) and two external ones (foreign IP, I have no administrative privileges). I've been using two views: the private one (for my clients, served by my servers) and a public one (for remote clients, served by al

Re: Choosing A records based on hosts' load?

2021-01-18 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) On 1/18/21 9:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 18.01.21 um 09:49 schrieb Marek Kozlowski: I believe that such a solution (read to install) should exist. Unfortunately I don't know the magic keywords to find it: I have a group of hosts with different IPs offering the same services. I&#

Choosing A records based on hosts' load?

2021-01-18 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) I believe that such a solution (read to install) should exist. Unfortunately I don't know the magic keywords to find it: I have a group of hosts with different IPs offering the same services. I'm able to install some agents on them for monitoring their network/cpu/number of users/whateve

Re: Multiple A and PTR and the "main" ones?

2015-09-11 Thread Marek Kozlowski
JECT Unacceptable HELO (Forged) /^yahoo\.es$/ > REJECT Unacceptable HELO (Forged) /^yahoo\.fr$/ > REJECT Unacceptable HELO (Forged) /^yahoo\.ie$/ > REJECT Unacceptable HELO (Forged) /^yahoo\.it$/ > REJECT Unacceptable HELO (Forged) /^yahoo\.jp$/ > REJECT Unacceptable HELO (Forged) /

Multiple A and PTR and the "main" ones?

2015-09-11 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) I have defined several A and PTR records for my main server. Unfortunately, recently I've noticed that some peer servers have problems with rev-resolving my IP (verifying the name and address) if there are too many As and PTRs. I'm wondering if it's possible to specify one A and one PTR as a "

Split horizon and some problems on sec.

2015-09-03 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) I have several domains for which I have two "internal" DNS servers (a primary and one of the secondaries) and two "external" DNS servers (both secondaries). There are six domains for each of them I have pairs of zone description files: a private (for internal clients) and a public (for all oth

Duplicate records?

2012-12-21 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) As I can see BIND allows duplicate A: pikusIN A 192.168.1.1 pikusIN A 192.168.1.2 and PTR: 192.168.1.1.IN PTR pikus.somedomain.com. 192.168.1.1.IN PTR filemon.somedomain.com. and disallows duplicate CNAMEs in the same way. For A and PTR both records are returned. My question

Re: split horizon and zone transfers to secondary DNS servers

2011-11-26 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) >> Or should I use separate secondary DNS servers for internal and >> external zones? > > That depends a bit on your setup. Judicious use of views with ACLs > could help you solve your problem regarding the zone transfers, but you > may feel more comfortable with separate servers. I understan

split horizon and zone transfers to secondary DNS servers

2011-11-25 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) I have defined two views (let's call them an `internal' and an `external') for my zones on the primary DNS server. Let's assume I'd like the secondary DNS server to use the same two views synchronized to the primary DNS. May I transfer *views* rather than zone description files? May I transfer

Re: multiple `zone' clauses for a single domain?

2011-11-25 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) One more question: The documentation for `match-clients' isn't comprehensive enough... Can I add all host from, for example 172.16/16 except a single host? Does: match-clients { 172.16.0.0/16;!172.16.1.1; } form an AND or an OR? Best regards, /m _

multiple `zone' clauses for a single domain?

2011-11-25 Thread Marek Kozlowski
:-) Forgive me a stupid question but I can't find the answer... Is it allowed to use a few `zone' clauses for a single domain? Is something like this correct: zone "mickey.mouse.com" in { type master; file "pri/mickey-public.zone"; allow-query { any; }; allow-trans