On 2/21/14 3:39 AM, "houguanghua" wrote:
> kevin,
>
> How does the local name server learn where is the 'stealth' slave? For the
> 'stealth' slave isn't in the NS records.
Also-notify directive. Either in an options stanza or a zone stanza.
>
> thanks,
> Guanghua
--
Daniel J McDonald, C
On 7/23/13 7:36 AM, "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" wrote:
>> In article ,
>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> No, it does not. If a mail gets delivered to address, which is sending it
>>> further ("forwarding it"), the envelope sender has to be changed, because
>>> it's not the original sender who s
On 7/2/13 8:42 AM, "Sam Wilson" wrote:
> There may be a subtle language thing going on here. I read the original
> post above as saying, literally, "you need PTR records because various
> software tries to match A and PTR records". It doesn't say "you need
> PTR records because some systems req
On 2/26/13 10:43 AM, "Sten Carlsen" wrote:
>
>
> On 26/02/13 15:50, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I would expect that a namecaching server on the mailserver would reduce
>> traffic and resources all the way around.
>>
>> I don't need my mailserver to constantly be asking my n
On 2/14/13 1:46 PM, "Mailinglists" wrote:
> I'm looking to migrate all of the zone data from one installation of Bind to
> another...hardware move. One machine is very old but running a pretty modern
> version of Bind 9.6-ESV-R8. The other server is running Bind 9.8.2 and is in
> use, so I'm mer
On 10/19/12 1:25 PM, "John Miller" wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Perhaps a Cisco list is a better destination for this, but I've seen a
> similar post here in the past couple of months, so posting here as well.
>
> I'm trying to get our Cisco ACE set up appropriately to handle DNS
> traffic.
On 5/7/12 11:32 AM, "M. Meadows" wrote:
>
> So ... if we have
>
> exacttarget.com delegated to ns1 and ns2.exacttarget.com nameservers
>
> and ... we manage the s6.exacttarget.com zone file from ns1 and
> ns2.exacttarget.com
>
> but we don't delegate s6 in the exacttarget.com zone file
On 5/7/12 8:29 AM, "hugo hugoo" wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have the following situation in my zone migration for one server (A) to
> another server (B)
>
> The zone is called toto.be and contains the following record:
>
> www.toto.be 86400 IN CNAME www.titi.be
>
>
> ==> the zone titi.be is i
On 3/20/12 7:15 AM, "trm asn" wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Stefan Certic
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> That can be achieved using iptables:
>>
>> iptables -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 53 -m state --state NEW -m nth
>> --counter 0 --every N --packet 0 -j DNAT --to-destina
On 3/13/12 8:20 AM, "hugo hugoo" wrote:
> ==> do I have to create in zone "toto.be" the following NS record:
>
> titi.toto.be. TTL IN NSns1.xxx.be
>
>
> I have found cases where this situation is present and other when it is not
> present...and both cases seems
On 8/31/11 10:13 PM, "风河" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found that some queries have got the response which has additional
> section, but some haven't.
> For example, this query with www.google.com got the answer with
> additional section set:
>
> $ dig www.google.com
> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 236
> $ dig w
On 7/28/11 3:16 AM, "uifid...@gmail.com" wrote:
> my czj.zone
> $TTL 86400
> czj. IN SOA localhost. root.localhost. (
> 1997022700 ; Serial
> 28800 ; Refresh
>
On 7/19/11 9:30 AM, "almah...@ranksitt.net" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If Bind version of primary dns is "bind-libs-9.3.6-16.P1.el5" and for
> secondary dns "bind-9.5.0-29.b2.fc9.i386".
>
> Is there create any problem??
In general, it creates no problem. If you happen to use an RR for which
support wa
On 7/11/11 12:15 PM, "Tony Finch" wrote:
> Daniel McDonald wrote:
>>
>> ; <<>> DiG 9.8.0-P4 <<>> @localhost ips.backscatterer.local ds
>> ; (1 server found)
>> ;; global options: +cmd
>> ;; Got answer:
>> ;; ->&g
On 7/8/11 10:41 AM, "Phil Mayers" wrote:
> On 08/07/11 15:13, Daniel McDonald wrote:
>> I have a number of zones being served by rbldnsd, with bind as a
>> front-end. The zones are defined as forward only in named.conf.
>>
>> When I enable dnssec valid
I have a number of zones being served by rbldnsd, with bind as a front-end.
The zones are defined as forward only in named.conf.
When I enable dnssec validatation, these zones report that they are
insecure.
08-Jul-2011 08:55:58.700 dnssec: info: validating @0xb4260ad8:
ips.backscatterer.local
I set up a zone with dnssec, and wanted to verify that it was working
properly. But I appear to have trouble with the root KSK.
$ dig +dnssec danmcdonald.us +topdown
;; No trusted key, +sigchase option is disabled
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3-P1 <<>> +dnssec danmcdonald.us +topdown
I appear to have the
On 6/7/11 7:51 AM, "Barry Finkel" wrote:
> There was a zone serial number mismatch, each zone expired three days
> ago, and new zones were transferred from the master. But the zone
> files on disk still have the higher serial numbers. There are no .jnl
> files on the disk. A "dig" on the serve
18 matches
Mail list logo
