Hi--
On Mar 22, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Bob Harold wrote:
[ ... ]
> I appreciate the announcement of the change ahead of time, but I don't feel
> like it is safe to update my root hints file based on an email, which could
> be spoofed. It's not that I don't trust you, but someone could spoof your
>
On Feb 5, 2016, at 6:09 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> Why point them to an IP at all, just use TTL and SOA , no A no nothing else.
>
> They'll get NXDOMAIN when trying to look it up, problem solved.
One might point such domains to a local webserver which has been configured
to reply to all image req
On Aug 7, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> I’m pretty new to BIND, and am tasked with monitoring several BIND server. A
> script is in place that runs hourly, via cron, looking for any anomalies in
> named.log. Here’s the essence of the script:
>
> grep -i -E ':
On Aug 6, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Heiko Richter wrote:
> Whenever I post something to the list (I'm not using SMTP, I'm using a
> usenet server to post to comp.protocols.dns.bind), my postmaster
> address receives DMARC notifications from list members that have
> employed this wonderful protocol on thei
On Jul 13, 2015, at 10:34 AM, Lucio Crusca wrote:
[ ... ]
> Yes the zone failed to update, I know because if I raise the seqno @ns1, it
> tries to update and it keeps failing. I don't understand why it fails. I
> doubt a Cisco router is to blame here because ns1 and ns2 are two guests of
> the
Hi, Mathew--
On May 21, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Mathew Ian Eis wrote:
> Hi BIND,
>
> I’ve been trying to track down the source of random latency in our production
> servers, without much luck. At random intervals - several times an hour -
> named appears to suddenly stop processing queries for aroun
Hi--
On Dec 9, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
> Wanted to point out that (perhaps sadly) this isn't so crazypants...or at
> least not uncommon. The *edge* and *aka* references speak Akamai DNS+CDN.
> From my last overview, this has gotten cleaner in the latest versions of
> th
Hi--
On Sep 30, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Bill Christensen
wrote:
> Fair enough.
>
> Africabound.org
> SustainableSources.com
>
> The server that's giving problems is ns1.sustainablesources.com
> 205.238.182.102
Your 102 box doesn't seem responding to 53/udp or 53/tcp from the outside:
http://w
Hi--
On Aug 19, 2014, at 1:47 PM, "Adamiec, Lawrence"
wrote:
> I am running BIND 9.6-ESV-R5-P1 on a Solaris 10 server. I can run queries
> without specifying a name server on my Solaris servers successfully. When I
> try to run a query on a Solaris 10 virtual server, I get "connection timed
Hi--
On Jan 20, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
> I have a full /24, which I would like to separate into two /25's, and
> assign each half to two of my customers. The snag is that *I* maintain
> the DNS for each of these customers.
>
> Is it possible to create the classless setup within m
Hi—
On Oct 28, 2013, at 9:05 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
> Slave X.internal.example.com
+1; it’s also worth looking into why there is such a high volume
of DNS queries. Is it simply a big network with a lot of chatty
clients? Or is TTL turned down so low that client side caching
is not effective and
Hi--
On Oct 2, 2013, at 9:18 PM, Balanagaraju Munukutla <9ba...@sg.ibm.com> wrote:
> Any one could help on the error below.
>
> [andrew@oc8163211842 ~] $ dig @.com abcd.com.sg mx
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 <<>> @x.com abcd.com.sg mx
> ; (1 server found)
> ;; global
Hi--
On Sep 25, 2013, at 12:22 PM, IT Support wrote:
> Hi charles
I'm "Chuck", although I've also answered to worse things than my full name. :-)
> this is what i get from dig
>
> dig host2.mydomain.com
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R4 <<>> ost2.mydomain.com
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got ans
On Jul 18, 2013, at 1:18 PM, John Miller wrote:
> I know that for the following record in example.com's zone file:
>
> host.example.com. IN CNAME otherhost
>
> BIND will return:
>
> host.example.com. IN CNAME otherhost.example.com.
Assuming $ORIGIN is set to example.com, but yes.
> Is this
On Jun 28, 2013, at 10:54 AM, "Ward, Mike S" wrote:
> Hello all, is there any reason to setup reverse address entries for a zone?
Certainly. Various software performs what's called a double-reverse lookup
to confirm that the A and PTR records match.
> I have asked some of the admins here and th
On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Norman Fournier wrote:
> [ ... ]
> (...Members of the httpd-users list says the same thing - its not an httpd
> problem.
>From what you've said below, they're quite right.
> I am just trying to take possibilities off my list of potential errors, sorry
> if I am ann
On Jun 17, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Norman Fournier wrote:
> I am working on bringing a virtual webserver behind a router online and am
> encountering problems.
OK. The odds are very good that you should ask about this on an
Apache/nginx/etc forum, as it's unlikely to be related to DNS or BIND.
> In
On Jun 11, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Gary Wallis wrote:
> DNS experts:
>
> What really happens in the real world when 1 out of three authoritative NSs
> are down for 30 minutes due to a datacenter outage?
Properly functioning nameservers will note that queries sent to the NS which is
down aren't getti
18 matches
Mail list logo
