> On 14 Feb 2025, at 09:49, Borja Marcos via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
>
>
>> On 13 Feb 2025, at 14:46, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>>
>> There’s official KB article on the topic:
>> https://kb.isc.org/docs/bind-memory-consumption-explained
> On 13 Feb 2025, at 14:46, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
> There’s official KB article on the topic:
> https://kb.isc.org/docs/bind-memory-consumption-explained - you actually need
> to use jeprof and understand the BIND 9 internals.
Thank you, I will check it out.
I just sent the message wondering
Hi,
I am running 9.18.32 and 9.20.4 on FreeBSD. I have noticed that 9.20.4 is using
much more memory 24 hours since restarting them, despite the fact that the
9.18.32 has a higher query load.
Nothing substantial now, but I would like to confirm (or not) whether someone
else has observed someth
> On 26 Nov 2024, at 14:36, Petr Špaček wrote:
>
> On 26. 11. 24 10:08, n/a via bind-users wrote:
>> I am a new user in bind9.
>> I have setup my DNS server with port 53, port 443 (DoH), and port 853 (DoT).
>> And now, in my logging file of `queries` category, one query example shows
>> as be
> On 25 Oct 2024, at 02:15, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> Take your machine to Apple. You have a hardware fault or a kernel security
> bug. A user application should not be able to make an operating system crash.
That’s interesting. I have heard of a similar problem but with a different OS
versi
> On 17 Sep 2024, at 22:39, Bischof, Ralph F. (MSFC-IS64)[AEGIS] via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> BIND 9.18.7
> RHEL 8.10 (Oopta)
> I am being asked if it is possible to differentiate the percentage of
> queries coming into a server that are unencrypted, DoT and DoH.
> Example: For
6 matches
Mail list logo
