> On 13 Feb 2025, at 14:46, Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: > > There’s official KB article on the topic: > https://kb.isc.org/docs/bind-memory-consumption-explained - you actually need > to use jeprof and understand the BIND 9 internals.
Thank you, I will check it out.
I just sent the message wondering whether someone had seen something similar.
It is a bit shocking given that 9.18 achieved better memory efficiency than the
previous versions if I remember well.
For now, what surprised me is:
Server one, highest query load, mostly clients querying the typical A records.
Server two, lower query load, pattern is different receiving lots of MX queries
from mail servers.
Both are running FreeBSD 14.2.. Bind compiled from ports.
Server one: 9.18.32
boot time: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 14:04:42 GMT
last configured: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 07:33:09 GMT
VM size: 632 MB, RES 446MB
Second two: 9.20.5
boot time: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:44:04 GMT
last configured: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:33:47 GMT
VM size: 1079MB, RES 945 MB.
The “sizes” are those reported by top (different from the Linux version).
I will keep monitoring and let you know.
Borja.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
