Re: AXFR from Windows 2008R2 failing after upgrading to 9.18

Any logs? Regards Ben Lavender On Mon, 23 May 2022, 21:52 Lefteris Tsintjelis via bind-users, < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > I must be missing something. Any ideas why does it fail? Everything > seems normal. Works well with Windows 2016. Downgrading to 9.16 works > agai

Re: Do not cache certain domains

Thanks, yes the second is actually the aim. We don't have secondaries since we use ADDS and BIND simply acts as a recursive service for the other internal domains. On 10/09/2020 16:01, Carl Byington wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 15:35 +0100

Re: Do not cache certain domains

Anyone think they may know the answer to this? Thanks Ben On 07/09/2020 23:00, Ben Lavender wrote: Hi, Without having to alter the TTL of the existing RRs as well as the default TTL. I know this can be done using cache-max-ttl to limit the whole cache, but can this be done for say one

Do not cache certain domains

Hi, Without having to alter the TTL of the existing RRs as well as the default TTL. I know this can be done using cache-max-ttl to limit the whole cache, but can this be done for say one single or multiple defined domains only? Thanks ___ Please v

Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: BIND Masters and slaves

Some servers already do Regards Ben Lavender On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 19:02 DeCaro, James John (Jim) CIV DISA FE (USA) via bind-users, wrote: > Or you can call the slave servers 'secondary' servers. > > > V/R > Jim DeCaro > DISA > Systems Administrator > Windows

Re: BIND Masters and slaves

The terminology is fairly misleading, as in the slave is not doing the work on-behalf of or instruction of the the master. But there is ways for the master to influence the slaves; such as "allow-transfer". I don't see the big issue with making a terminology change in this case. On 15/06/2020

Re: bind DoH ANd DoT Implementation

They go over this in the YT video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRbAigV2byE It might not give you a total insight on how to configure it step-by-step but enough On 08/06/2020 06:13, ShubhamGoyal wrote:  Dear all,    I want to ask about bind DoH Impl

Re: Static-stub server-addresses re-order

Don't suppose anyone knows this do they? Thanks On Wed, 19 Jun 2019, 16:21 Ben Lavender, wrote: > Hello, > > Quick question, if we have a number of these IPs that do not reply > (timeout), would BIND re-order these like it would with forwarder IPs? Or > would it fail if it

Static-stub server-addresses re-order

Hello, Quick question, if we have a number of these IPs that do not reply (timeout), would BIND re-order these like it would with forwarder IPs? Or would it fail if it used one that didn't reply? Thanks Regards Ben Lavender ___ Please visit

Forwarders with static-stub

Hi, When I setup static-stub zones with the global forwarders options configured, BIND by design forwards the requests before using the stubs. What is the best way around this so the stubs and cache are consulted first? This is required for split-brain DNS. Thanks Regards Ben Lavender

Re: Issues with Stub Zone

ting is more in line with type "static-stub" than with type "stub". Regards, Chris Buxton On May 7, 2019, at 4:08 PM, Ben Lavender wrote: Hi, I've been trying to configure a stub zone using both BIND 9.8x and 9.9x for some split-brain internal DNS. The problem I have is

Issues with Stub Zone

Hi, I've been trying to configure a stub zone using both BIND 9.8x and 9.9x for some split-brain internal DNS. The problem I have is that any client that requests the NS or SOA records for this zone gets SERVFAIL. The BIND server populates the /var/named/slaves/benlavender.co.uk.DB file with