864000 ; Expire
> 86400 ; Min TTL
> )
> ; Host
>
> sip.example.com. IN A 10.1.0.8
> ; Nameserver
> example.com. IN NS ns1.example.com.
>
> $ORIGIN sccnj04.example.com.
> sccnj04
om.
>>>>
>>>> You've already delegated stor.company.com, so delegations below
>>>> that need to be in the stor.company.com zone file.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> hth,
>>>>
>>>> Doug
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
>>>> -- OK Go
>>>>
>>>> Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the
DNS.
>>>> Yours for the right price. :)
>>>> http://SupersetSolutions.com/
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
company.com.
>>
>> You've already delegated stor.company.com, so delegations below
>> that need to be in the stor.company.com zone file.
>>
>>
>> hth,
>>
>> Doug
>>
>> --
>>
>> Nothin' ever doesn't chan
subdomain.stor.company.com, it times out.
Which servers are listed as a resolvers on your machine on which you're
running dig? If this is an UNIX machine, please show us your
/etc/resolv.conf and comment it.
Have you reloaded the zone stor.company.com properly?
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
is to handle such traffic at your mail
relay which is silently delivers messages destined for some domains to
/dev/null.
> Regards
> Gregory Machin
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
> wrote:
>> Hello Gregory,
>>
>>
>
n is why would "INMX10mcvpemr01" and "IN
>>>MX 10mcvpemr02" be repeated trough the zone file surely
>>> this is redundant ?
>> It looks like an old way of specifying the MX for each subdomain.
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
gt; IN MX 10 mcvpemr01
> IN MX 10 mcvpemr02
>
>
> My question is why would "INMX10mcvpemr01" and "INMX
> 10mcvpemr02" be repeated trough the zone file surely this is
> redundant
prevents you from accessing this website by timing out or
tampering DNS query results you can always put the entry like
192.168.10.20 www.domain.tld.
to your hosts file and access the site.
This technique is also in use when someone needs to access the site
which is on a not delegated domai
te list.
>>
>> This is NOT something BIND (or any DNS server) should do. Blocking
>> web sites is business for web proxies, firewalls etc. Doing this
>> stuff at DNS level could lead to many surprises.
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andr
't read in
Norwegian the methods the major Norwegian ISPs use to block the CP
domains?
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
vel could lead to many surprises.
Strongly agreed. And doing this brainf***ing stuff could lead to an
unpredictable glitches too.
"Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's, and unto God the
things that are God's" (Matthew 22:21).
--
Yours
Just have sent some similar thoughts to the list.
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
okup? Just think about the amount of such legacy and
sometimes obsolete *but working* software. Who would be responsible for
migration so the newer DNS tools would be used instead of nslookup? :)
Note: I'm not talking about my own scripts and tools (I'm using dig
and/or host whenever
ctions from the external hosts are fine too. If you still
experience troubles while working with the registrar control panel you
should consult with their support.
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
___
bind-use
s that the
TCP connections aren't blocked. But DNS uses TCP only in a limited
number of cases - most time the UDP protocol is being used for queries.
So you must verify that you _can_ query your server for something like
this:
dig @server-name-or-ip example.de. soa +norec
he? I looked at rndc and named options, but don't see anything
> that will help?
You can pull your zone data from you secondaries:
dig @secondary-server-name.domain.tld. your-domain.tld. axfr
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) ht
notify yes;
> allow-query { any; };
> allow-notify { 1.1.2.2; };
> };
> [r...@1.1.2.2]# cat /var/named/example.de.hosts
> $ORIGIN example.de.
> $TTL 86400
> example.de. IN SOA example.de. foo.example.de. (
>
r on
> 1.1.2.2 is giving me a headache.
It may be the zone transfer issue - the DENIC might want to trasfer the
zone example.de and your server at 1.1.1.1 has been configured to deny
these attempts originated from the unknown IPs. Grep your BIND log for
any error messages related to 'examp
this
server is installed on.
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Greetings Kevin,
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:16:37 -0500 Kevin Darcy wrote:
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote:
Greetings,
does the following setup violate any DNS RFCs or is it in the conflict
with any best practices
.domain3.tld3 are actually the same machine with
the IP.Add.ress.3.
What are the benefits of this setup?
Thanks in advance.
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users
Greetings Chris,
Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:01:50 +0200 Chris Hills wrote:
On 13/06/09 16:23, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote:
Also, is it possible to configure BIND to respond on
version.server. chaos txt and id.server. chaos txt in the same
manner as version.bind. and hostname.bind. (i.e
;any_text";
};
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.name/
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
23 matches
Mail list logo
