On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, at 16:54, Petr Špaček wrote:
>> [1] https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/5050
>
> BTW you can expedite fixing it if you test code changes in
> https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/merge_requests/9967
> and provide feedback.
Aha -- I had missed that -- I wi
On 13. 02. 25 17:17, Malcolm Scott via bind-users wrote:
I mainly noticed this because I am temporarily building my own patched
version of your package with a workaround for the SIG(0) key limit
problem I reported some months back [1],
[1] https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/iss
Hi Ondřej,
That's a fair point; I am indeed trusting you anyway by installing your
packages :-)
I mainly noticed this because I am temporarily building my own patched
version of your package with a workaround for the SIG(0) key limit problem I
reported some months back [1], and realised that
Hi Taavi,
It seems I was blind and didn't see the button.
Problem solved. Iterations set to 0 and salt to null. Everything green
now at DNSviz.
Best regards
Hans
--
On 07.02.25 17:05, Taavi Eomäe wrote:
Hi,
If you select the "Denial of existence" under options, then you will
see the exac
It's absolutely ok to drop the dependency for your custom packages.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ond...@isc.org
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
> On 13. 2. 2025, at 17:17, Malcolm Scott wrote:
Hi Malcolm,
if you trust me to produce BIND 9 code directly from the upstream,
I guess that trust can be transitioned to the packaging repositories.
The packaging is created in a way that makes it easy to create
packages for both Ubuntu and Debian in the same way.
I'll add some text to the KB, t
Hi all,
With apologies if this is a FAQ: why do the ISC BIND packages for Ubuntu,
linked from https://kb.isc.org/docs/isc-packages-for-bind-9 and published at
https://launchpad.net/~isc/+archive/ubuntu/bind, depend on
debsuryorg-archive-keyring? That package makes Apt trust a key for an
enti
There’s official KB article on the topic: https://kb.isc.org/docs/bind-memory-consumption-explained - you actually need to use jeprof and understand the BIND 9 internals.Baeldung wouldn’t be my first (nor the last choice) for something that’s really useful. My feeling is they optimize content for S
Not sure if we have a good howto on watching for memory leaks. But you could
run something like "sudo pmap [pid]" and watch it over time (like several
days). Expect some fluctuations for load. You may find a dependent library
that has an issue.
Others may have better tools that are commonly f
The increase could be for various reasons. The query pattern is different, the
underlying database is different, the other data structures are different.
Unless there’s unbounded growth (in the stats), or the cache memory goes over
configured limit, there’s nothing to worry about.
Sometimes it
Hi,
I am running 9.18.32 and 9.20.4 on FreeBSD. I have noticed that 9.20.4 is using
much more memory 24 hours since restarting them, despite the fact that the
9.18.32 has a higher query load.
Nothing substantial now, but I would like to confirm (or not) whether someone
else has observed someth
11 matches
Mail list logo
