The increase could be for various reasons. The query pattern is different, the underlying database is different, the other data structures are different. Unless there’s unbounded growth (in the stats), or the cache memory goes over configured limit, there’s nothing to worry about.
Sometimes it is possible to have smaller and faster, sometimes the smaller even means faster, but there are times where faster means larger. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 13. 2. 2025, at 10:16, Borja Marcos via bind-users > <bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am running 9.18.32 and 9.20.4 on FreeBSD. I have noticed that 9.20.4 is > using much more memory 24 hours since restarting them, despite the fact that > the 9.18.32 has a higher query load. > > Nothing substantial now, but I would like to confirm (or not) whether someone > else has observed something similar. > > Cheers, > > > > > Borja. > > > -- > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from > this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. > Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > <signature.asc> -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
