Re: Survey on the impact of software regulation on DNS systems

2025-02-01 Thread Michael De Roover
On Saturday, February 1, 2025 3:33:35 PM CET Peter 'PMc' Much wrote: > I tried to, but got the impression that the target audience is > rather commercial providers of infrastructure services, like > domain registrars and dns service providers. Not somebody like > me who just runs a cloud infrastruc

RE: Survey on the impact of software regulation on DNS systems

2025-02-01 Thread Marc
> > ! Users of Open Source projects are responsible themselves for what > ! they use.  You want to use a free image editor? fine, go ahead! > > Exactly, that is the idea! And I love it - it allows me to NOT > depend on service providers, to run my infrastructure in the way > I like it, and to be

Re: Survey on the impact of software regulation on DNS systems

2025-02-01 Thread Peter 'PMc' Much
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 03:43:23PM +, Marcus Kool wrote: ! I participated in the survey and think it is good to also have a ! public discussion. I tried to, but got the impression that the target audience is rather commercial providers of infrastructure services, like domain registrars and dns

Re: error - exiting (due to assertion failure)

2025-02-01 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi, first of all, you are running outdated version of BIND 9. You can either ask Ubuntu to update to the latest 9.18.33 version or use ISC official packages Secondly, it’s very hard to debug anything without debug symbols. You need to have a backtrace (and ideally a coredump) with debug package

Re: error - exiting (due to assertion failure)

2025-02-01 Thread Paul Ssekamatte via bind-users
Hi, I’m running BIND 9.18.30-0ubuntu0.22.04.2-Ubuntu in production on a university network. Recently, we have been experiencing the error shown below: named[4787]: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libisc-9.18.30-0ubuntu0.22.04.2-Ubuntu.so(isc_assertion_failed+0x10) [0x7fe1b4e1d7c0] named[4787]: /lib/x8

Primary/Secondary (Was: Master/Slave)

2025-02-01 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hey, since you've asked about ISC recommendations and good practice, we prefer to use the current DNS terminology as defined in RFC 8499[1] that says: > Although early DNS RFCs such as [RFC1996] referred to this as a "master", > the current common usage has shifted to "primary". and > Although