Re: Supporting LOC RR's

2022-05-02 Thread Timothe Litt
On 02-May-22 09:02, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:39:33PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote a message of 14 lines which said: Which problems do LOC solve? I remember adding LOC records for fun?() in the previous millennium when RFC 1876 was fresh out of the press. But even

Re: Bind and systemd-resolved

2022-05-02 Thread Nick Tait via bind-users
On 2/05/2022 8:13 pm, Reindl Harald wrote: you want 127.0.0.1 act as your resolver no matter what Well, not always... If your local BIND service isn't a recursive resolver irrelevant in context of this topic and worth exactly the same as saying "if you don't use bind at all" and honestly i

Re: Supporting LOC RR's

2022-05-02 Thread Jan-Piet Mens via bind-users
Fun is a sufficient reason. Definitely. IATA airport codes to LOC: % dig +short CDG.air.jpmens.net LOC 49 0 46.073 N 2 33 0.000 E 119.00m 1m 1m 10m and more fun with an associated TXT: % dig +short CDG.air.jpmens.net TXT "cc:FR; m:Paris; t:large, n:Charles de Gaulle International Airport

Re: Supporting LOC RR's

2022-05-02 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:39:33PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote a message of 14 lines which said: > Which problems do LOC solve? > > I remember adding LOC records for fun?() in the previous millennium when > RFC 1876 was fresh out of the press. But even back then paranoia > finally took over, and

Re: Supporting LOC RR's

2022-05-02 Thread Timothe Litt
On 01-May-22 05:03, Bob Harold wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 9:39 AM Bjørn Mork wrote: Timothe Litt writes: > Anyhow, it's not clear exactly what problem you're asking LOC (or > anything) to solve. Which problems do LOC solve? I remember adding LOC records for fun?()

Re: Bind and systemd-resolved

2022-05-02 Thread Mark Andrews
> On 2 May 2022, at 18:13, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 01.05.22 um 23:54 schrieb Nick Tait via bind-users: >> On 1/05/2022 9:13 pm, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Am 01.05.22 um 06:38 schrieb Nick Tait via bind-users: I'm not 100% sure, but I wonder if disabling systemd-resolved may create

Re: Bind and systemd-resolved

2022-05-02 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 01.05.22 um 23:54 schrieb Nick Tait via bind-users: On 1/05/2022 9:13 pm, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 01.05.22 um 06:38 schrieb Nick Tait via bind-users: I'm not 100% sure, but I wonder if disabling systemd-resolved may create issues if, for example, you are using netplan with systemd-network